CVE-2025-27462
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · unedited[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] The Windows PV drivers expose various facilities to userspace. Several of these have no security descriptor, and are therefore fully accessible to unprivileged users. These are: 1. XenCons, CVE-2025-27462 2. XenIface, CVE-2025-27463 3. XenBus, CVE-2025-27464
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceWindows PV (paravirtualization) drivers from Xen expose kernel-level facilities to userspace without security descriptors, allowing unprivileged users full access to XenCons (CVE-2025-27462), XenIface (CVE-2025-27463), and XenBus (CVE-2025-27464). This enables local privilege escalation or potential code execution via driver IOCTLs.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Xen PV drivers are installedCheck for the presence of Xen PV driver files or services. Look for driver names including xenbus, xencons, xeniface, or check Device Manager for Xen paravirtualization devices. Run 'sc query xenbus' or check registry under HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services for Xen* keys.Affected if Xen PV drivers (xenbus, xencons, xeniface) are installed and running on the system
-
Locate the Xen interface device objectsCheck for the presence of device objects in the Windows object manager. Look for device paths like \Device\XenCons, \Device\XenBus, \Device\XenIface, or check under HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\XenCons\Parameters\Device or similar registry locations for device references.Affected if Xen device objects (XenCons, XenBus, XenIface) exist on the system
-
Verify security descriptor configuration on Xen interfacesQuery the security descriptor on the Xen device interfaces using tools like WinObj or PowerShell Get-Acl commands targeting the device namespace. Check if the SDDL (Security Descriptor Definition Language) allows access from unprivileged users (S-1-5-32-544 for Administrators, S-1-5-4 for Interactive).Affected if The security descriptors on Xen device interfaces grant access to unprivileged users or contain weak/null DACLs (Discretionary Access Control Lists)
-
Test unprivileged user access to Xen interfacesAttempt to open or communicate with Xen device interfaces from a non-administrator account or using a low-privilege process. Monitor whether the open request succeeds or fails.Affected if Unprivileged (non-admin) users or processes can successfully open and communicate with XenCons, XenBus, or XenIface interfaces
-
Check for exposed userspace facilitiesReview the Xen driver configuration and look for any user-mode DLLs or services that expose the paravirtualization interface to userspace. Check for xencons.exe, xeniface.exe, or related user-mode components that may be running or accessible.Affected if Userspace facilities or DLLs related to Xen PV drivers are exposed and accessible without proper access controls
The environment is affected if Xen PV drivers (xenbus, xencons, xeniface) are installed and their device interfaces lack proper security descriptors, allowing unprivileged users to access them.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patches from Xen that add proper security descriptors to restrict driver access to privileged users only, or disable these drivers if not required.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,144.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-27462 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-27462 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data