CVE-2025-27464
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · unedited[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] The Windows PV drivers expose various facilities to userspace. Several of these have no security descriptor, and are therefore fully accessible to unprivileged users. These are: 1. XenCons, CVE-2025-27462 2. XenIface, CVE-2025-27463 3. XenBus, CVE-2025-27464
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe XenBus Windows PV driver exposes a facility to userspace without a security descriptor, allowing unprivileged users full access to what should be a privileged operation. This access control vulnerability in the hypervisor paravirtualized driver enables untrusted users to interact with the XenBus interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Xen PV drivers are installedCheck for Xen PV driver presence by looking for XenBus, XenNet, or Xeniface drivers in Device Manager under 'System devices' or check C:\Windows\System32\drivers\ for xen*.sys filesAffected if No Xen PV drivers are present, the system is not vulnerable to this specific CVE
-
Confirm XenBus driver is loadedRun 'sc query xenbus' or check Device Manager for 'Xen Bus' device under 'System devices' with status 'Running'Affected if XenBus driver is not loaded or not present, the vulnerability cannot be exploited
-
Check XenBus device permissionsUse 'wmic path Win32_LogicalFileSecuritySetting where "Path='C:\\Windows\\System32\\drivers\\xenbus.sys'" get' or check device security via Device Manager properties of the Xen Bus device - look for any entry granting full access to Users or EveryoneAffected if Unprivileged users (Users group, Everyone, or non-admin accounts) have Full Control or Write access to the XenBus device or driver file
-
Test unprivileged user access to XenBus interfaceCreate a standard (non-admin) user account and attempt to access XenBus-related device objects or registry keys under HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\XenBusAffected if Standard user can read/write to XenBus service configuration or device objects without elevation
The system is affected if it runs Windows with Xen PV drivers where the XenBus interface grants unprivileged users access to what should be privileged operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patches for the Xen PV drivers that add proper security descriptors to restrict XenBus access to privileged users only.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-27464 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-27464 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data