CVE-2025-27583
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect access control in the component /rest/staffResource/findAllUsersAcrossOrg of Serosoft Solutions Pvt Ltd Academia Student Information System (SIS) EagleR v1.0.118 allows create and modify user accounts, including an Administrator account.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Academia SIS EagleR v1.0.118 application contains a broken access control vulnerability in the /rest/staffResource/findAllUsersAcrossOrg REST endpoint. This endpoint allows unauthenticated or unauthorized attackers to create new user accounts and modify existing accounts, including elevating privileges to Administrator level, due to missing or inadequate authorization checks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= eagler-1.0.118CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Academia SIS EagleR installationIdentify if Serosoft Academia Student Information System is running in your environment by checking for web application files, services, or banner information mentioning 'Academia SIS' or 'EagleR'Affected if The application is installed and running
-
Verify installed versionCheck the application version through the web interface header/footer, API endpoint, configuration files, or server logs for 'eagler-1.0.118'Affected if Version is exactly 1.0.118 (eagler-1.0.118)
-
Test endpoint accessibilitySend an HTTP GET or POST request to /rest/staffResource/findAllUsersAcrossOrg and observe the responseAffected if Endpoint returns HTTP 200 or any valid response (not 401/403) without authentication credentials
-
Verify lack of authorization enforcementAttempt to access the endpoint without valid session tokens or credentials and check if the application allows account creation or modification operationsAffected if Endpoint permits operations without requiring authentication or proper authorization header/token
You are affected if Academia SIS EagleR version 1.0.118 is installed and the /rest/staffResource/findAllUsersAcrossOrg endpoint is accessible without authentication, allowing unauthorized account management operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper role-based access control (RBAC) on the /rest/staffResource/findAllUsersAcrossOrg endpoint to verify user authentication and ensure the requesting user has appropriate administrative privileges before allowing account creation or modification operations.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-27583 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-27583 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data