CVE-2025-27609
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIcinga Web 2 is an open source monitoring web interface, framework and command-line interface. A vulnerability in versions prior to 2.11.5 and 2.12.13 allows an attacker to craft a request that, once transmitted to a victim's Icinga Web, allows to embed arbitrary Javascript into it and to act on behalf of that user. This issue has been resolved in versions 2.11.5 and 2.12.3 of Icinga Web 2. As a workaround, those who have Icinga Web 2.12.2 may enable a content security policy in the application settings. Any modern browser with a working CORS implementation also sufficiently guards against the vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIcinga Web 2 before versions 2.11.5 and 2.12.3 contains a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious requests embedding arbitrary JavaScript into the application, enabling session hijacking or actions on behalf of authenticated users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.11.5>= 2.12.0, < 2.12.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Icinga Web 2 versionRun the command icingaweb2 --version or check the version file in your Icinga Web 2 installation directory, typically found in the about or about/show section of the web interfaceAffected if The version is less than 2.11.5 OR greater than or equal to 2.12.0 but less than 2.12.3
-
Confirm authentication is in useVerify that Icinga Web 2 is configured with user authentication enabled. Check your authentication configuration in etc/icingaweb2/authentication.ini or via the web interface under Configuration > AuthenticationAffected if Authentication is enabled, as the XSS vulnerability targets authenticated user sessions
-
Check for existing sessionsReview active user sessions in the web interface or check etc/icingaweb2/sessions.ini to confirm users have active authenticated sessionsAffected if Authenticated sessions exist, as the XSS could be used to hijack these sessions
-
Inspect Content Security Policy configurationNavigate to Configuration > Application > Security in the Icinga Web 2 web interface or check the security section in etc/icingaweb2/config.ini for Content-Security-Policy settingsAffected if CSP is disabled or not configured, meaning there is no browser-side protection against the XSS attack
You are affected if your installed Icinga Web 2 version is below 2.11.5 or between 2.12.0 and 2.12.3, and users have active authenticated sessions without CSP protection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.11.52.12.3
Upgrade to Icinga Web 2 version 2.11.5 or 2.12.3 or later. Alternatively, enable Content Security Policy in application settings or ensure modern browser CORS protections are active.
Icinga Web 2 version 2.11.5 or 2.12.3 (depending on your current major version)
- If running Icinga Web 2 version 2.11.x: upgrade to version 2.11.5
- If running Icinga Web 2 version 2.12.0 through 2.12.2: upgrade to version 2.12.3
- After upgrade, verify the vulnerability is resolved by testing that arbitrary JavaScript can no longer be embedded via crafted requests
- Alternatively, as a configuration workaround for Icinga Web 2.12.2: navigate to Application Settings and enable Content Security Policy (CSP) headers
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-27609 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-27609 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data