CVE-2025-27648
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) before Virtual Appliance Host 22.0.913 Application 20.0.2253 allows Cross Tenant Password Exposure V-2024-003.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a cross-tenant password exposure vulnerability in Vasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic). The flaw allows authentication credentials to be improperly exposed across tenant boundaries in the multi-tenant virtual appliance environment, potentially granting unauthorized access to another tenant's sensitive password data. The vulnerability exists in versions prior to Virtual Appliance Host 22.0.913 and Application 20.0.2253.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 20.0.2253< 22.0.913CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Vasion Print installationConfirm the presence of Vasion Print or PrinterLogic software in your environment. Check system inventory or installed applications for 'Vasion Print' or 'PrinterLogic'.Affected if Vasion Print or PrinterLogic is installed
-
Check Virtual Appliance Host versionAccess the Virtual Appliance management interface or use the system's version check command to determine the Virtual Appliance Host version number.Affected if Virtual Appliance Host version is below 22.0.913
-
Check Application versionAccess the application administration console or use the application's version display function to determine the Application version number.Affected if Application version is below 20.0.2253
-
Verify multi-tenant configurationCheck if the environment is configured for multi-tenancy. Review tenant settings in the Vasion Print administration panel to confirm multiple tenants exist.Affected if Multi-tenancy is enabled and either component version is below the fixed releases
You are affected if Vasion Print or PrinterLogic is installed with Virtual Appliance Host below 22.0.913 or Application below 20.0.2253 in a multi-tenant configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped20.0.225322.0.913
Upgrade Vasion Print Virtual Appliance Host to version 22.0.913 or later AND Application to version 20.0.2253 or later to remediate the cross-tenant password exposure.
Vasion Print 20.0.2253 or higher; Virtual Appliance 22.0.913 or higher
- Upgrade Vasion Print to version 20.0.2253 or later
- Upgrade Virtual Appliance to version 22.0.913 or later
- After upgrade, verify the credentials protection mechanisms are functioning properly
- Review access logs for any unauthorized access that may have occurred before patching
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-27648 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-27648 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data