Manageengine Adaudit PlusApplication · Zohocorp

CVE-2025-27709

HIGH · 8.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-06-09
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 8.5 or later.
See remediation →
89/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Zohocorp ManageEngine ADAudit Plus versions 8510 and prior are vulnerable to authenticated SQL injection in the Service Account Auditing reports.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

ManageEngine ADAudit Plus versions 8510 and prior contain an authenticated SQL injection vulnerability in the Service Account Auditing reports module. Attackers with valid credentials can inject malicious SQL statements through unsanitized input parameters in these reports, potentially allowing unauthorized data extraction, modification, or further system compromise depending on database privileges.

MitigationApply the vendor-supplied patch for ADAudit Plus to a version newer than 8510. As a temporary mitigation, restrict access to the Service Account Auditing reports to minimal necessary users and implement WAF rules to detect SQL injection patterns.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Manageengine Adaudit PlusApplication
Affected:< 8.5= 8.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify ADAudit Plus installation
    Locate the ManageEngine ADAudit Plus installation directory, typically found in C:\ManageEngine\ADAudit Plus or /opt/ManageEngine/ADAudit Plus on Linux. Check for the product's root folder.
    Affected if ADAudit Plus is installed on the system
  2. Determine installed version
    Check the version by opening the ADAudit Plus web UI and viewing the About page, or locate the version file in the installation directory (often named version.txt or build.properties). Compare the version number to 8.5 or build 8510.
    Affected if The installed version is 8.5 or 8510, or any version prior to 8.5 (build numbers below 8510)
  3. Verify Service Account Auditing module status
    Log into ADAudit Plus with administrator credentials and navigate to the Service Account Auditing section under the Reports module. Confirm whether this specific report category is enabled and accessible.
    Affected if The Service Account Auditing reports module is present and accessible to users
  4. Check user access to vulnerable module
    In ADAudit Plus admin console, go to Admin Settings > User Access Control or Roles/Profiles. Identify which users or roles have permission to access the Service Account Auditing reports.
    Affected if Any user account with valid credentials (beyond strict minimum) has access to the Service Account Auditing reports module
  5. Inspect SQL input handling in reports
    Access the Service Account Auditing reports and examine the input parameters available for filtering (such as account name, domain, or date ranges). Note whether these parameters accept free-form text without visible input validation indicators.
    Affected if The reports accept user-supplied input parameters without apparent sanitization or use of parameterized queries

A system is affected if ADAudit Plus version 8.5 or 8510 (or prior) is installed AND the Service Account Auditing reports module is accessible to users with valid credentials.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 8.5 or later
Fixed in 8.5
Interim mitigation

Apply the vendor-supplied patch for ADAudit Plus to a version newer than 8510. As a temporary mitigation, restrict access to the Service Account Auditing reports to minimal necessary users and implement WAF rules to detect SQL injection patterns.

Fix this in Manageengine Adaudit Plus Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-27709 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-27709 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data