Incorrect Default PermissionsWeakness · CWE-276

CVE-2025-2782

MEDIUM · 6.3 CVSS v4.0 Published 2025-03-28
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
65/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The WatchGuard Terminal Services Agent on Windows does not properly configure directory permissions when installed in a non-default directory. This could allow an authenticated local attacker to escalate to SYSTEM privileges on a vulnerable system.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

WatchGuard Terminal Services Agent for Windows has a directory permission misconfiguration vulnerability when installed in a non-default directory. This allows an authenticated local user to potentially manipulate files or execute code with SYSTEM privileges due to overly permissive access controls on the installation directory.

MitigationInstall the Terminal Services Agent in the default directory path, or manually configure restrictive permissions on the installation directory to prevent unauthorized user access. Apply vendor patches when available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
Authentication
X
User interaction
None
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify WatchGuard Terminal Services Agent is installed
    Check the Windows registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for an entry named 'WatchGuard Terminal Services Agent' or look for the program in Add/Remove Programs. Alternatively, check if the service 'WatchGuard Terminal Services Agent' exists in services.msc.
    Affected if The software is not installed on the system.
  2. Locate the installation directory
    Open Registry Editor and navigate to HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{WatchGuard Terminal Services Agent} and read the 'InstallLocation' value. Alternatively, right-click the service in services.msc and check the path to the executable.
    Affected if Unable to determine the installation path.
  3. Determine if the installation path is non-default
    Compare the discovered installation path to the default location. The default installation path is typically C:\Program Files\WatchGuard\Terminal Services Agent\ or C:\Program Files (x86)\WatchGuard\Terminal Services Agent\. Any path outside these default directories is considered non-default.
    Affected if The installation directory is NOT one of the default paths.
  4. Inspect directory permissions
    Right-click the installation folder in File Explorer, select Properties, then go to the Security tab. Check which users and groups have permissions and what level of access they have. Specifically look for whether Authenticated Users, Users, or Everyone have Full Control, Modify, or Write permissions.
    Affected if Users other than Administrators and SYSTEM have Write, Modify, or Full Control permissions to the installation directory.

The system is affected if WatchGuard Terminal Services Agent is installed in a non-default directory with overly permissive access controls that allow non-admin users to modify files in the installation folder.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Install the Terminal Services Agent in the default directory path, or manually configure restrictive permissions on the installation directory to prevent unauthorized user access. Apply vendor patches when available.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,820
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,912.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-2782 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-2782 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data