Information ExposureWeakness · CWE-200

CVE-2025-27827

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-06-24
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the legacy chat component of Mitel MiContact Center Business through 10.2.0.3 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to conduct an information disclosure attack due to improper handling of session data. A successful exploit requires user interaction and could allow an attacker to access sensitive information, leading to unauthorized access to active chat rooms, reading chat data, and sending messages during an active chat session.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A high-severity information disclosure vulnerability in Mitel MiContact Center Business legacy chat component (versions through 10.2.0.3) allows unauthenticated attackers to access active chat rooms, read chat data, and send messages by exploiting improper session data handling. User interaction is required for exploitation.

MitigationUpgrade to the vendor-provided patched version of MiContact Center Business and review session management implementations in the legacy chat component.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Mitel MiContact Center Business is installed
    Check for the application in standard installation directories (Windows: Program Files\Mitel\MiContact Center Business or similar; Linux: /opt/mitel/ or /usr/local/mitel/) or check running services for MiContact Center processes
    Affected if MiContact Center Business software is present on the system
  2. Determine the installed version of MiContact Center Business
    Check the application's version through its admin interface, check installed program information (Windows Add/Remove Programs or Linux package manager), or examine version files in the installation directory. Compare the version to 10.2.0.3
    Affected if The installed version is 10.2.0.3 or any earlier version (e.g., 10.2.0.2, 10.2.0.1, 10.1.x, etc.)
  3. Verify if the legacy chat component is enabled
    Check the MiContact Center Business admin panel configuration for the legacy chat component status, or examine configuration files in the installation directory for chat-related settings (look for terms like 'legacy chat', 'chat module', or 'chat service')
    Affected if The legacy chat component is actively enabled or configured in the system
  4. Inspect session handling configuration for the chat module
    Examine the configuration files or admin settings related to session management in the legacy chat component. Look for session timeout settings, session token configuration, or session persistence settings
    Affected if Session management is configured to use the legacy handler without proper session isolation or token validation settings

The environment is affected if MiContact Center Business version 10.2.0.3 or earlier is installed AND the legacy chat component is enabled, as the vulnerability requires both conditions to be present for exploitation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to the vendor-provided patched version of MiContact Center Business and review session management implementations in the legacy chat component.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing10.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,580
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-27827 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-27827 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data