CVE-2025-27918
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in AnyDesk for Windows before 9.0.5, AnyDesk for macOS before 9.0.1, AnyDesk for Linux before 7.0.0, AnyDesk for iOS before 7.1.2, and AnyDesk for Android before 8.0.0. It has an integer overflow and resultant heap-based buffer overflow via a UDP packet during processing of an Identity user image within the Discovery feature, or when establishing a connection between any two clients.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis vulnerability involves an integer overflow in AnyDesk's UDP packet processing that leads to a heap-based buffer overflow. The flaw occurs when processing Identity user images within the Discovery feature or during client-to-client connection establishment, allowing remote code execution via specially crafted UDP packets.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed AnyDesk versionOn Windows, open Programs and Features or run 'ad -v' in AnyDesk folder. On macOS, check /Applications/AnyDesk.app info. On Linux, run 'anydesk --version' or check package manager. On mobile, check app store or device settings.Affected if Version is below 9.0.0 on any platform (Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android)
-
Verify Discovery feature statusOpen AnyDesk settings, navigate to Privacy or Network settings, look for 'Discovery' or 'LAN Discovery' option. On Windows, this may be in the advanced settings or registry key.Affected if Discovery feature is enabled and version is below 9.0.0, allowing remote exploitation via LAN UDP packets
-
Confirm UDP listener is activeRun 'netstat -anp | grep anydesk' or 'ss -ulnp | grep anydesk' on Linux. On Windows, use 'netstat -an' and look for UDP listeners on AnyDesk ports (typically 7070, 50001-50010). Check if anydesk.exe is bound to UDP addresses.Affected if AnyDesk is listening on UDP ports and version is below 9.0.0, making the vulnerable UDP packet processing code active
User is affected if AnyDesk version is below 9.0.0 AND the Discovery feature is enabled OR UDP connections are accepted, allowing remote code execution via specially crafted UDP packets to the Discovery or client-to-client connection handlers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.0.0
Update AnyDesk to version 9.0.5 or later on Windows, 9.0.1 or later on macOS, 7.0.0 or later on Linux, 7.1.2 or later on iOS, and 8.0.0 or later on Android. If immediate patching is not possible, consider disabling the Discovery feature and restricting UDP-based connections through network segmentation.
Windows: 9.0.5+, macOS: 9.0.1+, Linux: 7.0.0+, iOS: 7.1.2+, Android: 8.0.0+
- Identify the platform(s) where AnyDesk is installed (Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, or Android)
- For Windows: Navigate to anydesk.com or the official download page and download AnyDesk version 9.0.5 or later
- For macOS: Navigate to anydesk.com or the official download page and download AnyDesk version 9.0.1 or later
- For Linux: Navigate to anydesk.com or the official download page and download AnyDesk version 7.0.0 or later
- For iOS: Open the App Store, search for AnyDesk, and update to version 7.1.2 or later
- For Android: Open Google Play Store, search for AnyDesk, and update to version 8.0.0 or later
- Uninstall any older versions of AnyDesk from all affected systems
- Install the downloaded updated version of AnyDesk
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-27918 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-27918 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data