Clinical Collaboration PlatformApplication · Philips

CVE-2025-27954

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-06-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue in Clinical Collaboration Platform 12.2.1.5 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information and execute arbitrary code via the usertoken function of default.aspx.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A remote attacker can exploit the usertoken function in default.aspx of Clinical Collaboration Platform 12.2.1.5 to both retrieve sensitive information and achieve arbitrary code execution. This indicates a severe input validation or authentication flaw in the usertoken functionality that allows unauthenticated or low-privilege users to access unintended data and execute system commands.

MitigationApply vendor patch for Clinical Collaboration Platform 12.2.1.5 addressing the usertoken function vulnerability; if unavailable, temporarily restrict network access to default.aspx and implement WAF rules for the usertoken endpoint.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Clinical Collaboration PlatformApplication
Affected:= 12.2.1.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Clinical Collaboration Platform version
    Access the system administration interface or check the application binaries/manifest for the exact version number. Look for version information in the application metadata, about page, or registry entries if on Windows.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 12.2.1.5.
  2. Locate default.aspx in the web application
    Check the web root directory for the presence of default.aspx. Verify if it handles the usertoken function by examining the application's URL structure (e.g., /default.aspx, /default.aspx?usertoken=...).
    Affected if default.aspx exists and is accessible via the web interface.
  3. Verify usertoken function accessibility
    Attempt to access the usertoken endpoint with various user privilege levels (anonymous, low-privilege, admin). Observe whether the function responds without requiring full authentication.
    Affected if The usertoken function responds to unauthenticated requests or low-privilege users without proper authorization checks.
  4. Review access logs for usertoken endpoint activity
    Examine web server access logs, IIS logs, or application logs for requests to default.aspx with usertoken parameters. Look for requests from unexpected IP addresses, unusual timing patterns, or successful responses to non-admin users.
    Affected if Logs show successful usertoken requests from unauthenticated sources or privilege escalation patterns.

You are affected if your environment runs Philips Clinical Collaboration Platform version 12.2.1.5 and the usertoken function in default.aspx is accessible without proper authentication or authorization controls.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patch for Clinical Collaboration Platform 12.2.1.5 addressing the usertoken function vulnerability; if unavailable, temporarily restrict network access to default.aspx and implement WAF rules for the usertoken endpoint.

Fix this in Clinical Collaboration Platform Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing10.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,580
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-27954 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-27954 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data