CVE-2025-2883
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Accept SagePay Payments Using Contact Form 7 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.0 through the publicly accessible phpinfo.php script. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to view potentially sensitive information contained in the exposed file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Accept SagePay Payments Using Contact Form 7 WordPress plugin exposes a publicly accessible phpinfo.php script in versions up to 2.0, allowing unauthenticated attackers to retrieve sensitive server configuration details including PHP version, environment variables, and path information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if the SagePay Contact Form 7 plugin is installedCheck the WordPress wp-content/plugins directory for a folder containing 'sagepay' and 'contact-form-7' in the nameAffected if The plugin folder exists in the WordPress plugins directory
-
Check the installed plugin versionOpen the main plugin PHP file (usually the primary plugin file with the same name as the folder) and look for version information in the file header commentsAffected if The reported version is 2.0 or lower
-
Check for phpinfo.php presenceList the files in the plugin directory and look for a file named phpinfo.phpAffected if The phpinfo.php file exists within the plugin directory
-
Verify public accessibility of phpinfo.phpAttempt to access the phpinfo.php file via a web browser or curl request using the expected URL path (plugin directory path appended with /phpinfo.php)Affected if The file is accessible via HTTP and displays PHP configuration information including version, environment variables, and paths
The environment is affected if the plugin is present with version 2.0 or lower and the phpinfo.php file is publicly accessible on the web server.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRemove the phpinfo.php file from the plugin directory or restrict access via web server configuration (e.g., .htaccess rules), and update the plugin to the latest patched version when available.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-2883 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-2883 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data