Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-28897

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-03-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Steveorevo Domain Theme domain-theme allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Domain Theme: from n/a through <= 1.3.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A CSRF vulnerability in the Steveorevo Domain Theme (versions 1.3 and below) allows attackers to trick authenticated administrators into submitting malicious requests that store XSS payloads in the database, which then execute when visitors view affected pages.

MitigationAdd anti-CSRF tokens to all forms and state-changing operations in the theme, and implement proper input sanitization and output encoding for all user-supplied data before storage and display.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Steveorevo Domain Theme installation
    Check the theme directory (wp-content/themes/steveorevo-domain or similar) for theme files. Look for style.css with Theme Name: Steveorevo Domain Theme in the header comment.
    Affected if The theme directory exists and contains the Steveorevo Domain Theme files.
  2. Determine installed theme version
    Open the theme's style.css file and locate the 'Version:' field in the theme header comment. Compare this version number to 1.3.
    Affected if The installed version is 1.3 or lower (e.g., 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1.0).
  3. Locate admin forms that store data to database
    Inspect theme template files (especially those in admin, includes, or template directories) for PHP code that handles form submissions and saves data to the WordPress database using functions like update_option, wp_insert_post, or custom table inserts.
    Affected if Theme contains PHP files with form handlers that accept user input and store it in the database without a separate admin page load.
  4. Verify presence of anti-CSRF tokens in forms
    Search the theme's PHP files for form submissions and check if they implement WordPress nonces (wp_nonce_field, wp_verify_nonce) or equivalent CSRF tokens. Look for nonce verification in form handling code.
    Affected if Forms that store data to the database lack nonce verification or use nonce verification inconsistently.
  5. Check input sanitization on stored data
    Review form handling code for sanitization functions (sanitize_text_field, esc_attr, sanitize_html_class, etc.) applied to user input before database storage.
    Affected if User-supplied data from forms is stored in the database without sanitization functions or with insufficient sanitization.
  6. Inspect output encoding for stored data
    Examine template files that display stored data (theme options, custom fields, widget content) for output encoding functions (esc_html, esc_attr, wp_kses_post) when rendering the stored values.
    Affected if Stored data is echoed to pages without proper output encoding, allowing stored XSS to execute.

If the installed version is 1.3 or below AND the theme contains admin-accessible forms that store data without CSRF tokens or proper sanitization/encoding, the environment is affected by this CVE.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Add anti-CSRF tokens to all forms and state-changing operations in the theme, and implement proper input sanitization and output encoding for all user-supplied data before storage and display.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-28897 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-28897 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data