SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2025-28959

CRITICAL · 9.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-07-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Md Yeasin Ul Haider URL Shortener exact-links allows SQL Injection.This issue affects URL Shortener: from n/a through <= 3.0.7.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

SQL Injection vulnerability in Md Yeasin Ul Haider URL Shortener (exact-links) allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized user input fields. The vulnerability affects versions through 3.0.7 and is rated critical due to the potential for complete database compromise.

MitigationImplement parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database operations; upgrade to patched version once available; validate and sanitize all user inputs before using them in SQL queries.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the application version
    Inspect the source code for a version identifier (often in files like version.php, package.json, composer.json, or a VERSION file). Look for a variable or constant defining the software version, typically found in the root directory or a config file.
    Affected if The version is 3.0.7 or lower
  2. Find database query code handling user input
    Search the codebase for SQL query execution functions (such as query(), execute(), or raw SQL string construction). Identify files in directories related to URL creation, redirection, or user management where user-supplied data is incorporated into queries.
    Affected if User-provided data (e.g., URL parameters, form inputs) is directly concatenated or interpolated into SQL query strings without visible sanitization
  3. Verify if prepared statements are used
    Examine the identified query code for use of parameterized queries or prepared statements. Look for patterns like placeholder binding ($1, ?, :param), separate prepare() and execute() calls, or ORM query builders with bound parameters.
    Affected if The SQL queries handling user input do not use prepared statements or parameterized queries; raw string concatenation is used instead
  4. Identify vulnerable input fields
    Review the application's input handling for fields used in SQL operations, such as URL parameters in shortening requests, search fields, or user profile inputs. Check the request handlers and controller logic where these inputs flow into database calls.
    Affected if Any user-accessible input field (GET/POST parameters) is used directly in SQL queries without sanitization or parameter binding
  5. Test the application's input validation
    Submit typical SQL injection payloads (such as single quotes, UNION SELECT, or boolean-based tests) through the application's input forms or URL parameters. Observe whether the application returns database errors or behaves differently based on SQL syntax.
    Affected if The application reflects database errors or displays unexpected behavior when SQL injection payloads are submitted, indicating unsanitized input processing

You are affected if your installed version is 3.0.7 or lower AND the application uses direct SQL string construction with user input without prepared statements or sanitization.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database operations; upgrade to patched version once available; validate and sanitize all user inputs before using them in SQL queries.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-28959 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-28959 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data