Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-28986

HIGH · 8.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-06-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
89/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Webaholicson Epicwin Plugin epicwin-subscribers allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Epicwin Plugin: from n/a through <= 1.5.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the epicwin-subscribers component of the Epicwin Plugin allows authenticated administrators to unknowingly trigger SQL injection attacks. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that, when visited by a logged-in admin, cause the browser to send forged requests to the vulnerable endpoint, enabling arbitrary SQL command execution.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens and origin validation on all state-changing operations in the epicwin-subscribers functionality, and parameterize database queries to prevent the SQL injection that CSRF can trigger.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Epicwin plugin is installed
    Check the WordPress plugins directory or admin panel for the Epicwin plugin presence. Common paths: /wp-content/plugins/ or via WordPress admin > Plugins.
    Affected if Epicwin plugin is not installed means this CVE does not apply
  2. Determine the installed Epicwin plugin version
    Read the main plugin file header (e.g., epicwin.php) to find the Version comment, or check the plugin metadata in WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed Plugins.
    Affected if Version cannot be determined or is unknown - treat as potentially affected
  3. Verify the epicwin-subscribers component exists
    Check for the presence of subscriber-related files in the plugin directory, such as files named 'subscribers.php', 'subscriber.php', or a 'subscribers' folder within the Epicwin plugin structure.
    Affected if The epicwin-subscribers component is present and active in the plugin
  4. Confirm admin authentication state
    Determine if any administrator session is active or was recently active on the WordPress site, as the CSRF attack requires a logged-in administrator to trigger the forged request.
    Affected if An administrator user is authenticated or has an active session on the site
  5. Inspect subscribers endpoint for anti-CSRF protection
    Examine the code handling subscriber state-changing operations (add/edit/delete functions) in the epicwin-subscribers component for presence of nonce tokens, CSRF tokens, or referer validation. Check if form submissions or AJAX calls include anti-CSRF mechanisms.
    Affected if No anti-CSRF tokens or origin validation are found on state-changing operations in the subscribers functionality

A user is affected if the Epicwin plugin is installed with the epicwin-subscribers component present and the endpoint lacks anti-CSRF protections on state-changing operations, combined with an active administrator session.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens and origin validation on all state-changing operations in the epicwin-subscribers functionality, and parameterize database queries to prevent the SQL injection that CSRF can trigger.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-28986 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-28986 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data