CVE-2025-29821
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper input validation in Dynamics Business Central allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceImproper input validation in Microsoft Dynamics Business Central allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of user inputs, which could enable a local attacker with valid credentials to access sensitive information they should not have access to.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 23.1.13812, < 23.18.32409< 24.12.32447>= 25.1.25900, < 25.6.32556< 26.0.32481CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Business Central version via PowerShellOpen PowerShell as administrator and run: Get-NAVServerInstance -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue | Select-Object ServerInstance, Version, State. Alternatively, check the Windows Services list for 'Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central Server' service and view its properties to find the version.Affected if The displayed version falls within any of the affected ranges: 23.1.13812 to 23.18.32409 (2023), 24.x to 24.12.32447 or 25.1.25900 to 25.6.32556 (2024), or below 26.0.32481 (2025).
-
Confirm the Business Central year/season releaseThe version number structure indicates the release year: versions starting with 23.x are 2023, 24.x are 2024, 25.x are early 2024 service update, and 26.x is 2025. Verify which release channel your instance belongs to by checking the version number prefix.Affected if Your instance is any 2023, 2024, or 2025 release that matches the version ranges in step 1.
-
Check if local authentication is enabledThis vulnerability requires a local attacker with valid credentials. Verify local Windows authentication methods are in use by reviewing the Business Central Server configuration in the Dynamics 365 Administration Center or via PowerShell: Get-NavServerUser -ServerInstance <instance> | Where-Object {$_.AuthenticationEmail -eq $null}.Affected if Local Windows authentication or database authentication is configured, allowing local users to log in with valid credentials.
You are affected if your Business Central installation version matches any of the affected version ranges for 2023, 2024, or 2025 releases AND local user authentication is enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped23.18.3240924.12.3244725.6.32556
Apply the vendor patch when released through Microsoft Update. In the meantime, restrict local access to trusted personnel and monitor for unusual local access patterns.
Dynamics 365 Business Central 2023 (23.18+), 2024 (24.12+ or 25.6+), or 2025 (26.0+) depending on current release wave
- 1. Identify the current Dynamics 365 Business Central version by navigating to the Business Central admin center or checking the system information in the client.
- 2. Determine which release wave (2023, 2024, or 2025) the current installation belongs to based on the version number.
- 3. For Business Central 2023: Upgrade to version 23.18.32409 or later.
- 4. For Business Central 2024: If on version 24.x, upgrade to 24.12.32447 or later. If on version 25.x, upgrade to 25.6.32556 or later.
- 5. For Business Central 2025: Upgrade to version 26.0.32481 or later.
- 6. Schedule the upgrade during a maintenance window to minimize business impact.
- 7. After upgrading, verify the system is operational and test critical business workflows.
- 8. Review release notes for the target version to ensure all dependencies and integrations remain compatible.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-29821 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-29821 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data