DataverseApplication · Microsoft

CVE-2025-29826

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-05-13
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.4.0.1406 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper handling of insufficient permissions or privileges in Microsoft Dataverse allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A privilege escalation vulnerability in Microsoft Dataverse allows an authenticated attacker to elevate their privileges beyond what their account is authorized for, due to improper handling of permission checks. This could enable unauthorized access to data or administrative functions within the Dataverse environment.

MitigationApply Microsoft's forthcoming patch for Dataverse; in the interim, audit role-based access control (RBAC) assignments and enforce least-privilege principles to limit potential blast radius.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
DataverseApplication
Affected:< 3.4.0.1406

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Dataverse environment version
    In the Power Platform admin center, select your environment and view the version information under 'Details', or use the Power Apps Maker Portal > Settings > About Microsoft Dataverse. Alternatively, query the Dataverse Web API endpoint: /api/discovery/v1.0/instances
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 3.4.0.1406
  2. Review user role assignments
    Using the Power Platform Admin Center, navigate to the Dataverse environment > Users > See all users, then check each user's security role. Or use the Dataverse Web API to query the 'role' table and 'systemuser' table joined to identify role associations.
    Affected if Any user account has been assigned privileges beyond what their job function requires, or role assignments do not follow least-privilege principles
  3. Audit recently added or modified security roles
    In the Power Platform Admin Center, use the 'Audit' feature to review security role changes. Query the 'audit' table filtering by 'action' = 'Update' and 'objecttype' = 'role' for recent changes.
    Affected if Unapproved modifications to security roles exist, or roles with elevated permissions were created recently
  4. Check for privilege escalation indicators in audit logs
    Enable and review Dataverse audit logs for 'Securities' category. Look for instances where users accessed data or performed actions outside their assigned security role permissions.
    Affected if Audit logs show users executing operations or accessing data that their assigned security roles should not permit

You are affected if your Microsoft Dataverse version is below 3.4.0.1406 AND your environment contains authenticated users with elevated or misconfigured role-based access control assignments.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.4.0.1406 or later
Fixed in 3.4.0.1406
Interim mitigation

Apply Microsoft's forthcoming patch for Dataverse; in the interim, audit role-based access control (RBAC) assignments and enforce least-privilege principles to limit potential blast radius.

Recommended fix High confidence

3.4.0.1406

  1. Upgrade Microsoft Dataverse to version 3.4.0.1406 or later to address the privilege escalation vulnerability

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Dataverse Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,720
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-29826 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-29826 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data