CVE-2025-29841
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Universal Print Management Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a race condition vulnerability in the Universal Print Management Service where improper synchronization of shared resources allows an authorized attacker to manipulate timing to elevate privileges locally from their existing authorized access level to higher system privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.19044.5854< 10.0.19045.5854< 10.0.22621.5335< 10.0.22631.5335< 10.0.26100.4061< 10.0.20348.3692< 10.0.25398.1611< 10.0.26100.4061CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Universal Print Management Service is presentOpen Services.msc and look for 'Universal Print Management Service' or run: Get-Service -Name 'UniversalPrint*' in PowerShellAffected if The service exists and is installed on the system
-
Confirm Windows version is within affected build rangeRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Version"' and compare the build number against the listed thresholds (19044, 19045, 22621, 22631, 26100, 20348, 25398)Affected if The installed build number is lower than the fixed versions for your Windows release (21h2, 22h2, 23h2, 24h2, Server 2022, Server 2022 23h2, or Server 2025)
-
Check if Universal Print is enabled in Windows SettingsNavigate to Settings > Bluetooth & devices > Printers & scanners > Universal Print, or run: Get-PrintService -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue to check print service statusAffected if Universal Print client or connector is registered and enabled on the endpoint
-
Verify user has authorized print accessReview which users have print permissions via 'Get-Printer | Format-List' or check Print Management console for assigned print rolesAffected if Any non-admin user account with print queue management or printer installation rights is present on the system
The system is affected if Universal Print Management Service is installed, the Windows build falls below the fixed versions listed, and the environment has users with print-related permissions that could be exploited through the race condition.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.19044.585410.0.19045.585410.0.20348.3692
Apply the relevant Windows security updates for Universal Print Management Service once released, or disable Universal Print if not required in the environment.
Microsoft Security Update (CVE-2025-29841) - Specific build numbers: Windows 10 21h2: 10.0.19044.5854 | Windows 10 22h2: 10.0.19045.5854 | Windows 11 22h2: 10.0.22621.5335 | Windows 11 23h2: 10.0.22631.5335 | Windows 11 24h2: 10.0.26100.4061 | Windows Server 2022: 10.0.20348.3692 | Windows Server 20
- Identify the affected Windows version and build number by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo'
- Open Windows Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update
- Click 'Check for updates' and install all available security updates
- Alternatively, for enterprise environments, use Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) or Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager to deploy the security update
- Verify the installation completed successfully by checking the installed updates or re-running 'winver' to confirm the build number matches or exceeds the fixed version for your product
- Restart the system if prompted to complete the installation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-29841 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-29841 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data