Missing AuthenticationWeakness · CWE-306

CVE-2025-29870

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-04-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing authentication for critical function vulnerability exists in Wi-Fi AP UNIT 'AC-WPS-11ac series'. If exploited, a remote unauthenticated attacker may obtain the product configuration information including authentication information.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A missing authentication vulnerability in the Wi-Fi AP AC-WPS-11ac series allows remote unauthenticated attackers to access critical configuration functions and retrieve sensitive product configuration data, including authentication credentials, without any credentials.

MitigationApply vendor patches when available. In the interim, isolate the device behind a firewall or VPN to limit exposure to unauthenticated network attackers, and monitor for unauthorized access attempts.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify device model
    Check the device label, web interface, or SNMP sysDescr for the exact model number to confirm it is part of the AC-WPS-11ac series
    Affected if The device is an AC-WPS-11ac model
  2. Determine firmware version
    Check the device web interface system status page, or use manufacturer tools or SNMP to retrieve the firmware version
    Affected if The installed firmware version is unpatched and matches the vulnerable AC-WPS-11ac series releases
  3. Verify network exposure
    Scan the device IP from an untrusted network segment or use port scanning from outside your firewall to determine if HTTP/HTTPS management ports (commonly 80, 443, or vendor-specific ports) are accessible without VPN or firewall filtering
    Affected if The device management interface is directly accessible from untrusted networks without authentication
  4. Test unauthenticated configuration access
    Using a browser or HTTP client, attempt to access common configuration endpoints (such as /config, /settings, /status, or manufacturer-specific paths) on the device IP without providing any login credentials
    Affected if Configuration pages or sensitive data including credentials are returned without requiring authentication
  5. Review access logs
    Check the device logs, syslog exports, or management platform logs for requests to configuration functions from unfamiliar IP addresses or patterns indicating unauthorized enumeration
    Affected if Logs show configuration access or credential retrieval attempts from unexpected sources without corresponding authenticated sessions

The environment is affected if the device is an AC-WPS-11ac access point with unpatched firmware and its management interface is accessible from untrusted networks without authentication, allowing retrieval of configuration data including credentials.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patches when available. In the interim, isolate the device behind a firewall or VPN to limit exposure to unauthenticated network attackers, and monitor for unauthorized access attempts.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-29870 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-29870 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data