CVE-2025-29882
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA NULL pointer dereference vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to launch a denial-of-service (DoS) attack. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.2.5.3145 build 20250526 and later QuTS hero h5.2.5.3138 build 20250519 and later
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in QNAP QTS and QuTS hero operating systems allows an authenticated remote attacker to cause denial of service by exploiting the vulnerability after gaining a user account.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.2.0.2737= 5.2.0.2744= 5.2.0.2782= 5.2.0.2802= 5.2.0.2823= 5.2.0.2851= 5.2.0.2860= 5.2.1.2930= 5.2.2.2950= 5.2.3.3006= 5.2.4.3070= 5.2.4.3079= h5.2.0.2737= h5.2.0.2782= h5.2.0.2789= h5.2.0.2802= h5.2.0.2823= h5.2.0.2851= h5.2.0.2860= h5.2.1.2929= h5.2.1.2940= h5.2.2.2952= h5.2.3.3006= h5.2.4.3070CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed QTS versionLog into QNAP admin console, navigate to Control Panel > System > Firmware > Firmware Status, or run `cat /proc/version` via SSH if enabledAffected if The displayed firmware version matches any of these: 5.2.0.2737, 5.2.0.2744, 5.2.0.2782, 5.2.0.2802, 5.2.0.2823, 5.2.0.2851, 5.2.0.2860, 5.2.1.2930, 5.2.2.2950, 5.2.3.3006, 5.2.4.3070, or 5.2.4.3079
-
Identify installed QuTS hero versionLog into QuTS hero admin console, navigate to Control Panel > System > Firmware > Firmware Status, or check system information via SSH if enabledAffected if The displayed firmware version matches any of these: h5.2.0.2737, h5.2.0.2782, h5.2.0.2789, h5.2.0.2802, h5.2.0.2823, h5.2.0.2851, h5.2.0.2860, h5.2.1.2929, h5.2.1.2940, h5.2.2.2952, h5.2.3.3006, or h5.2.4.3070
-
Confirm remote administrative access is enabledCheck if the QNAP web admin interface (port 8080 or 443) is accessible from external networks, or review firewall/port forwarding rules on the deviceAffected if The QTS or QuTS hero admin interface is reachable from outside the local network
The environment is affected if the device runs any QTS version from 5.2.0.2737 through 5.2.4.3079, or any QuTS hero version from h5.2.0.2737 through h5.2.4.3070, and the admin interface is accessible to an authenticated remote attacker.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate QTS to version 5.2.5.3145 build 20250526 or later, or QuTS hero to version h5.2.5.3138 build 20250519 or later. Ensure strong account credentials to prevent unauthorized access.
QTS 5.2.5.3145 (build 20250526 or later) or QuTS hero h5.2.5.3138 (build 20250519 or later)
- 1. Identify your current QTS or QuTS hero version by accessing the QNAP admin interface and checking System Settings > About
- 2. Confirm your current version matches one of the affected versions: QTS 5.2.0.2737, 5.2.0.2744, 5.2.0.2782, or 5.2.0.2802; or QuTS hero h5.2.0.2737, h5.2.0.2782, h5.2.0.2789, or h5.2.0.2802
- 3. Back up critical data and configuration settings before performing any firmware upgrade
- 4. Access the QNAP admin interface and navigate to Control Panel > System > Firmware Update
- 5. Select "Check for Update" and ensure the system updates to QTS version 5.2.5.3145 (build 20250526 or later) for QTS systems, or QuTS hero version h5.2.5.3138 (build 20250519 or later) for QuTS hero systems
- 6. Complete the upgrade process and verify the new version is installed correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-29882 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-29882 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data