CVE-2025-29939
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper access control in secure encrypted virtualization (SEV) could allow a privileged attacker to write to the reverse map page (RMP) during secure nested paging (SNP) initialization, potentially resulting in a loss of guest memory confidentiality and integrity.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a vulnerability in AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) with Secure Nested Paging (SNP). During SNP initialization, improper access controls allow a privileged attacker to write to the Reverse Map Page (RMP), potentially compromising guest VM memory confidentiality and integrity.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if CPU supports AMD SEV-SNPRun 'grep -o sev-snp /proc/cpuinfo' or check 'cpuid | grep -i sev' to see if the CPU has SEV-SNP capability flagsAffected if If no SEV-SNP support is present, the system is not vulnerable to this specific SNP initialization flaw
-
Verify SEV-SNP is enabled in the systemCheck /sys/kernel/debug/sev-SNP or run 'kvmstat -l | grep sev-snp' to see if SEV-SNP is actively usedAffected if If SEV-SNP is not enabled or initialized, the attack surface does not exist for this specific flaw
-
Check BIOS/UEFI SEV settingsAccess BIOS/UEFI setup and look for 'SEV', 'SEV-ES', or 'SEV-SNP' enablement options under processor or security settingsAffected if If SEV-SNP is disabled in BIOS, the vulnerability does not apply as SNP initialization never occurs
-
Query AMD SEV firmware versionRun 'dmesg | grep -i sev' or check /sys/firmware/efi/efivars for SEV-SNP status; compare the reported firmware version against AMD-provided SNP firmware releasesAffected if If the firmware version is older than AMD's patched SEV-SNP microcode releases, the system may be affected
-
Check kernel SEV-SNP supportRun 'cat /proc/cmdline' and look for 'mem_encrypt=on' or 'sev-snp' kernel parameters, and verify the kernel version supports SEV-SNP (kernel 5.10+ with CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT_ACTIVE)Affected if If kernel lacks SEV-SNP support and the feature is not initialized, the specific flaw cannot be exploited
A system is affected only if it has AMD SEV-SNP-capable hardware, has SEV-SNP enabled in BIOS and the OS, and is running firmware versions prior to AMD's patched SEV-SNP microcode releases.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply AMD-provided firmware/microcode updates for SEV-SNP and ensure BIOS updates from system vendors are deployed. Verify SEV functionality after updates.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-29939 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-29939 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data