InjectionWeakness · CWE-74

CVE-2025-3003

MEDIUM · 6.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-03-31
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
69/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in ESAFENET CDG 3. Affected is an unknown function of the file /CDGServer3/UserAjax. The manipulation of the argument Username leads to sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in ESAFENET CDG 3's /CDGServer3/UserAjax endpoint allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the Username parameter. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 6.3 (MEDIUM) and has been publicly disclosed, increasing exploitation risk.

MitigationImplement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database interactions involving user input. Until an official vendor patch is available, consider web application firewall (WAF) rules to block SQL injection patterns in the Username parameter.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify ESAFENET CDG 3 installation
    Search for CDG 3 related processes, services, or web applications running on the server. Check for CDGServer3 in running services or installed software listings.
    Affected if ESAFENET CDG 3 is installed and running on the system
  2. Verify UserAjax endpoint accessibility
    Attempt to access the /CDGServer3/UserAjax endpoint via HTTP/HTTPS request to determine if the web interface is exposed. Check if the endpoint responds to requests.
    Affected if The /CDGServer3/UserAjax endpoint is accessible over the network
  3. Test Username parameter for SQL injection
    Send a crafted request to the UserAjax endpoint with the Username parameter set to a SQL injection test payload (such as a single quote or boolean-based test). Observe the application response for SQL error messages or unexpected behavior.
    Affected if The Username parameter accepts input and the application processes it without proper sanitization, leading to SQL errors or anomalous behavior
  4. Review application logs for SQL injection indicators
    Examine web server logs, application logs, and database logs for patterns indicating SQL injection attempts against the UserAjax endpoint. Look for SQL syntax in Username parameter values.
    Affected if Logs show SQL injection attempts or successful exploitation signatures in the Username parameter
  5. Check database for unauthorized data access or manipulation
    Review database audit logs or query the database directly to check for unauthorized data access, privilege escalation, or data modification that correlates with UserAjax endpoint usage.
    Affected if Database shows unauthorized queries or modifications originating from the UserAjax endpoint

A user is affected if ESAFENET CDG 3 is running and the /CDGServer3/UserAjax endpoint is accessible with the Username parameter vulnerable to SQL injection.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database interactions involving user input. Until an official vendor patch is available, consider web application firewall (WAF) rules to block SQL injection patterns in the Username parameter.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-3003 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-3003 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data