CVE-2025-30062
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the "CheckUnitCodeAndKey.pl" service, the "validateOrgUnit" function is vulnerable to SQL injection.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe validateOrgUnit function in the CheckUnitCodeAndKey.pl service is vulnerable to SQL injection, allowing attackers to manipulate database queries through unsanitized user input. This is a server-side injection vulnerability that could enable unauthorized data access or manipulation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the CheckUnitCodeAndKey.pl service fileSearch the system for the CheckUnitCodeAndKey.pl file using file system searches (e.g., find / -name 'CheckUnitCodeAndKey.pl' or locate CheckUnitCodeAndKey.pl)Affected if The file exists and is in use by the organization
-
Identify the validateOrgUnit functionOpen CheckUnitCodeAndKey.pl and locate the validateOrgUnit function definition within the codeAffected if The validateOrgUnit function is present in the file
-
Examine SQL query construction in validateOrgUnitReview the validateOrgUnit function code and look for SQL query strings, particularly any that concatenate or interpolate variables directly into the queryAffected if SQL queries are constructed using string variables without parameterization
-
Check if user input reaches SQL without sanitizationTrace the data flow from function parameters or external input sources (request parameters, environment variables) into the SQL query strings within validateOrgUnitAffected if User-supplied input flows into SQL queries without being sanitized, validated, or parameterized
-
Verify if prepared statements are usedSearch the validateOrgUnit function for use of prepare, execute, bind_param, or similar parameterization methods typical in Perl DBI or other database interfacesAffected if No parameterized queries or prepared statements are found in the function
-
Confirm the service is exposed and accepts inputDetermine if the CheckUnitCodeAndKey.pl service is running as a web service or API that accepts external input through HTTP requests, command-line arguments, or network connectionsAffected if The service is network-accessible and processes external input
The environment is affected if the CheckUnitCodeAndKey.pl service exists, contains a validateOrgUnit function, and that function passes user input directly into SQL queries without parameterization or input validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries in validateOrgUnit with parameterized queries or prepared statements, implement strict input validation, and apply least-privilege database access controls.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,016.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30062 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30062 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data