SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2025-30062

MEDIUM · 6.9 CVSS v4.0 Published 2026-03-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In the "CheckUnitCodeAndKey.pl" service, the "validateOrgUnit" function is vulnerable to SQL injection.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The validateOrgUnit function in the CheckUnitCodeAndKey.pl service is vulnerable to SQL injection, allowing attackers to manipulate database queries through unsanitized user input. This is a server-side injection vulnerability that could enable unauthorized data access or manipulation.

MitigationReplace dynamic SQL queries in validateOrgUnit with parameterized queries or prepared statements, implement strict input validation, and apply least-privilege database access controls.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
Authentication
X
User interaction
None
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the CheckUnitCodeAndKey.pl service file
    Search the system for the CheckUnitCodeAndKey.pl file using file system searches (e.g., find / -name 'CheckUnitCodeAndKey.pl' or locate CheckUnitCodeAndKey.pl)
    Affected if The file exists and is in use by the organization
  2. Identify the validateOrgUnit function
    Open CheckUnitCodeAndKey.pl and locate the validateOrgUnit function definition within the code
    Affected if The validateOrgUnit function is present in the file
  3. Examine SQL query construction in validateOrgUnit
    Review the validateOrgUnit function code and look for SQL query strings, particularly any that concatenate or interpolate variables directly into the query
    Affected if SQL queries are constructed using string variables without parameterization
  4. Check if user input reaches SQL without sanitization
    Trace the data flow from function parameters or external input sources (request parameters, environment variables) into the SQL query strings within validateOrgUnit
    Affected if User-supplied input flows into SQL queries without being sanitized, validated, or parameterized
  5. Verify if prepared statements are used
    Search the validateOrgUnit function for use of prepare, execute, bind_param, or similar parameterization methods typical in Perl DBI or other database interfaces
    Affected if No parameterized queries or prepared statements are found in the function
  6. Confirm the service is exposed and accepts input
    Determine if the CheckUnitCodeAndKey.pl service is running as a web service or API that accepts external input through HTTP requests, command-line arguments, or network connections
    Affected if The service is network-accessible and processes external input

The environment is affected if the CheckUnitCodeAndKey.pl service exists, contains a validateOrgUnit function, and that function passes user input directly into SQL queries without parameterization or input validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Replace dynamic SQL queries in validateOrgUnit with parameterized queries or prepared statements, implement strict input validation, and apply least-privilege database access controls.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,510
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,016.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30062 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30062 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data