Memory Buffer Bounds ErrorWeakness · CWE-119

CVE-2025-3007

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-03-31
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability was found in Novastar CX40 up to 2.44.0. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects the function getopt of the file /usr/nova/bin/netconfig of the component NetFilter Utility. The manipulation of the argument cmd/netmask/pipeout/nettask leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Stack-based buffer overflow in the getopt function of /usr/nova/bin/netconfig in Novastar CX40 firmware up to 2.44.0 allows manipulation of cmd/netmask/pipeout/nettask arguments to overflow a stack buffer, potentially enabling code execution or DoS. Public exploit available.

MitigationNetwork-segment affected devices and restrict access to the netconfig utility; implement input validation on the affected arguments. Contact vendor for patched firmware and monitor for exploitation attempts.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Novastar CX40 firmware version
    Access the device's firmware settings or web interface to view the current firmware version; compare against the affected range of 2.44.0 and below
    Affected if Firmware version is 2.44.0 or lower (any version up to 2.44.0)
  2. Verify netconfig binary exists
    Locate the file /usr/nova/bin/netconfig on the device filesystem using find or ls commands
    Affected if The binary exists at the specified path /usr/nova/bin/netconfig
  3. Confirm netconfig is accessible and in use
    Check file permissions and verify the binary is executable; examine if netconfig is invoked by any services or scripts on the device
    Affected if The binary is present and accessible (readable/executable) on the system
  4. Identify usage of affected arguments
    Review any scripts, cron jobs, or web interfaces that invoke netconfig with the cmd, netmask, pipeout, or nettask arguments; use command history or process monitoring if available
    Affected if The device uses netconfig with any of the affected arguments (cmd/netmask/pipeout/nettask)
  5. Check for signs of exploitation or compromise
    Examine system logs, running processes, and network connections for anomalies; look for unexpected modifications to the netconfig binary or its behavior
    Affected if Indicators of compromise are found, such as unexpected processes, binary modification, or suspicious network activity related to netconfig

A user is affected if they have a Novastar CX40 device running firmware version 2.44.0 or lower with the /usr/nova/bin/netconfig binary accessible and the affected arguments (cmd/netmask/pipeout/nettask) in use.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Network-segment affected devices and restrict access to the netconfig utility; implement input validation on the affected arguments. Contact vendor for patched firmware and monitor for exploitation attempts.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
26.0 hours of engineering $4,580
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,328.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-3007 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-3007 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data