CVE-2025-30107
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn IROAD V9 devices, Managing Settings and Obtaining Sensitive Data and Sabotaging the Car Battery can be performed by unauthorized parties. A vulnerability in the dashcam's configuration management allows unauthorized users to modify settings, disable critical functions, and turn off battery protection, potentially causing physical damage to the vehicle.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe IROAD V9 dashcam has a configuration management vulnerability that allows unauthenticated users to access sensitive settings, modify device configuration, disable critical functions, and turn off battery protection features. This could lead to physical damage to the vehicle's battery system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm the device is an IROAD V9 dashcamAccess the device web interface or mobile app and verify the model number displays as IROAD V9. Check the device label or firmware information page for the exact model designation.Affected if The device model is IROAD V9
-
Verify configuration endpoints do not require authenticationAttempt to access the device configuration pages directly via the web interface URL (commonly /config, /settings, or /admin) without entering any login credentials. Observe whether the configuration panels load without a login prompt.Affected if Configuration pages load and display settings without requiring any username or password
-
Check if battery protection settings are accessible without authenticationNavigate to the battery protection or power management configuration section of the dashcam interface. Verify whether these sensitive settings are visible or modifiable without first authenticating.Affected if Battery protection settings such as voltage cut-off thresholds, parking mode battery monitoring, or related power protection features are accessible without login
-
Test if configuration parameters can be modified without credentialsAttempt to change a configuration setting (such as disabling a feature or altering a parameter) without providing any login credentials. Observe whether the changes are accepted and applied by the device.Affected if Configuration changes can be saved and applied without any authentication step
A user is affected if their IROAD V9 dashcam exposes configuration or battery protection settings without requiring authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authentication and authorization controls for all configuration endpoints, ensure battery protection settings cannot be modified without proper authentication, and issue a firmware update to address the vulnerability.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $14,016.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30107 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30107 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data