CVE-2025-3011
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSOOP-CLM from PiExtract has a SQL Injection vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands to read, modify, and delete database contents.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSOOP-CLM from PiExtract contains an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands, enabling full database compromise with ability to read, modify, or delete any data in the database.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm SOOP-CLM installationIdentify whether the PiExtract SOOP-CLM application is present in your environment. Check for installation directories, running services, or application listings.Affected if SOOP-CLM from PiExtract is installed and running
-
Determine SOOP-CLM versionLocate the installed version by checking the application binary, configuration files, or version information command provided by the vendor. Common locations include startup scripts, manifest files, or a version flag like --version.Affected if The installed version has not been patched to address CVE-2025-3011
-
Verify unauthenticated access exposureInspect whether the SOOP-CLM web interface, API endpoints, or remote service is accessible without authentication. Check network listener configurations and access control settings.Affected if The application accepts unauthenticated remote connections and exposes functionality that processes database queries
-
Identify input handling pathwaysExamine the application configuration to determine which features accept user-supplied input and forward it to database queries. Look for search fields, parameter inputs, or API parameters.Affected if User-controllable input can reach database query execution paths without proper sanitization
You are affected if SOOP-CLM from PiExtract is running and accessible remotely without authentication while processing user input through unsanitized database queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries/prepared statements for all database operations and apply strict input validation; temporarily deploy a WAF rule filtering SQL injection patterns until the code fix is fully deployed.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-3011 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-3011 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data