CVE-2025-30132
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered on IROAD Dashcam V devices. It uses an unregistered public domain name as an internal domain, creating a security risk. During analysis, it was found that this domain was not owned by IROAD, allowing an attacker to register it and potentially intercept sensitive device traffic. If the dashcam or related services attempt to resolve this domain over the public Internet instead of locally, it could lead to data exfiltration or man-in-the-middle attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIROAD Dashcam V devices use an unregistered public domain name for internal communications. An attacker can register this domain and intercept dashcam traffic, potentially leading to data exfiltration or man-in-the-middle attacks when the device resolves the domain over the public Internet.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device modelIdentify if the device is an IROAD Dashcam V by checking the device label, packaging, or firmware boot screen for the model identifierAffected if Device is an IROAD Dashcam V model
-
Capture device DNS queriesUse network monitoring (such as a packet capture on the router or a network tap) to observe what domains the dashcam resolves when connected to the InternetAffected if Device resolves an unfamiliar or suspicious public domain for internal communications
-
Check domain registration statusPerform a WHOIS lookup on the domain identified in step 2 using a public WHOIS service or command-line tool (whois example.com)Affected if The resolved domain is either unregistered, registered to an unknown entity, or not controlled by IROAD
-
Inspect network traffic destinationExamine the destination IP addresses or hostnames in the device's outbound network traffic using packet capture or network logsAffected if Traffic is being sent to a domain that is not registered to or controlled by IROAD
-
Verify firmware sourceCheck the firmware version and source by accessing the device settings or IROAD's official support pageAffected if Firmware has not been updated to use a properly registered and controlled domain
The device is affected if it is an IROAD Dashcam V that resolves or communicates with an unregistered or attacker-controllable public domain for internal operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataIROAD must register the domain themselves or refactor the firmware to use a properly controlled domain/internal resolution; users should monitor for firmware updates addressing this domain hijacking risk.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,776.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30132 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30132 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data