CVE-2025-3022
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOs command injection vulnerability in e-solutions e-management. This vulnerability allows an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the server via the ‘client’ parameter in the /data/apache/e-management/api/api3.php endpoint.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOS command injection vulnerability in e-solutions e-management where the 'client' parameter in the /data/apache/e-management/api/api3.php endpoint is not properly sanitized before being used in shell commands, allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands on the server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the e-management applicationSearch for the 'e-management' directory in the web root, typically under /data/apache/ or check web server document roots for this application folderAffected if The e-management application is present on the server
-
Identify the vulnerable scriptCheck if the file /data/apache/e-management/api/api3.php exists on the filesystemAffected if The file api3.php exists in the expected path
-
Verify the client parameter is processedExamine the source code of api3.php and search for usage of the 'client' parameter (e.g., $_GET['client'] or $_POST['client']) being passed to shell execution functions like exec(), shell_exec(), system(), or passthru()Affected if The 'client' parameter is directly used in shell execution without sanitization
-
Confirm network accessibilityVerify the /data/apache/e-management/api/api3.php endpoint is accessible over HTTP/HTTPS from the networkAffected if The endpoint is reachable and accepts requests containing the 'client' parameter
-
Check for command execution capabilityReview the web server user permissions and whether the web server process has the ability to execute operating system commandsAffected if The web server runs with privileges that allow command execution
Your environment is affected if the e-management application is installed, the api3.php file exists with the vulnerable 'client' parameter being passed to shell functions without input sanitization, and the endpoint is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation and use parameterized methods or safe API functions instead of passing user input directly to shell commands. Alternatively, refactor to avoid shell execution entirely.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-3022 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-3022 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data