CVE-2025-30267
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA NULL pointer dereference vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to launch a denial-of-service (DoS) attack. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.2.5.3145 build 20250526 and later QuTS hero h5.2.5.3138 build 20250519 and later
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in QNAP QTS and QuTS hero operating systems allows an authenticated remote attacker to cause a denial-of-service condition. The attacker first requires valid user credentials to access the system before exploiting the NULL pointer dereference to crash the affected service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.2.0.2737= 5.2.0.2744= 5.2.0.2782= 5.2.0.2802= 5.2.0.2823= 5.2.0.2851= 5.2.0.2860= 5.2.1.2930= 5.2.2.2950= 5.2.3.3006= 5.2.4.3070= 5.2.4.3079= h5.2.0.2737= h5.2.0.2782= h5.2.0.2789= h5.2.0.2802= h5.2.0.2823= h5.2.0.2851= h5.2.0.2860= h5.2.1.2929= h5.2.1.2940= h5.2.2.2952= h5.2.3.3006= h5.2.4.3070CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the QNAP operating system productAccess the QNAP admin web interface and check System Settings > System > About, or run 'getsysinfo' via SSH to determine if the system runs QTS or QuTS heroAffected if The system is running QTS or QuTS hero
-
Check QTS versionIn QTS admin UI, go to Control Panel > System > Firmware Update > Check for Update, or run 'cat /etc/version' via SSH to obtain the exact build versionAffected if The version matches any of: 5.2.0.2737, 5.2.0.2744, 5.2.0.2782, 5.2.0.2802, 5.2.0.2823, 5.2.0.2851, 5.2.0.2860, 5.2.1.2930, 5.2.2.2950, 5.2.3.3006, 5.2.4.3070, or 5.2.4.3079
-
Check QuTS hero versionIn QuTS hero admin UI, go to Control Panel > System > Firmware Update > Check for Update, or run 'cat /etc/version' via SSH to obtain the exact build versionAffected if The version matches any of: h5.2.0.2737, h5.2.0.2782, h5.2.0.2789, h5.2.0.2802, h5.2.0.2823, h5.2.0.2851, h5.2.0.2860, h5.2.1.2929, h5.2.1.2940, h5.2.2.2952, h5.2.3.3006, or h5.2.4.3070
-
Verify remote access exposureCheck if the QNAP admin web interface (port 8080 or 443) is exposed to the internet or untrusted networks by reviewing firewall rules or network configurationAffected if The admin interface is accessible from untrusted networks and user accounts exist that could be compromised
The system is affected if it runs QTS version 5.2.0.2737 through 5.2.4.3079 or QuTS hero h5.2.0.2737 through h5.2.4.3070, and an attacker with valid credentials can reach the admin interface remotely.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-provided patches: QTS 5.2.5.3145 build 20250526 or later, or QuTS hero h5.2.5.3138 build 20250519 or later. Ensure user account security to prevent unauthorized access that could precede exploitation.
QTS 5.2.5.3145 build 20250526 or later; QuTS hero h5.2.5.3138 build 20250519 or later
- Identify the current QTS or QuTS hero version running on the QNAP device
- For QTS systems: upgrade to QTS 5.2.5.3145 build 20250526 or later
- For QuTS hero systems: upgrade to QuTS hero h5.2.5.3138 build 20250519 or later
- After upgrade, verify the system is running the patched version
- Confirm the vulnerability is resolved by checking the QNAP security advisory
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30267 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30267 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data