FirefoxWeb browser · Mozilla

CVE-2025-3030

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-04-01
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 128.8.0 / 136.0 or later.
See remediation →
90/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Memory safety bugs present in Firefox 136, Thunderbird 136, Firefox ESR 128.8, and Thunderbird 128.8. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 137, Firefox ESR 128.9, Thunderbird 137, and Thunderbird 128.9.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Memory safety bugs in Firefox 136 and Thunderbird 136 (and ESR versions 128.8) that could allow memory corruption and potentially arbitrary code execution via carefully crafted web content. The specific memory corruption types are not detailed but are typical of Firefox's memory safety class vulnerabilities.

MitigationUpgrade immediately to Firefox 137, Firefox ESR 128.9, Thunderbird 137, or Thunderbird 128.9. Organizations should deploy the updates via their standard patch management processes and verify completion across all affected endpoints.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FirefoxWeb browser
Affected:< 128.8.0< 136.0
ThunderbirdApplication
Affected:< 128.8.0>= 129.0, < 136.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check Firefox version
    Open Firefox, go to Help > About Firefox, or navigate to about:support, or run: firefox --version
    Affected if Version is below 128.8.0 or between 128.8.0 and 135.x (any version below 136.0)
  2. Check Thunderbird version
    Open Thunderbird, go to Help > About Thunderbird, or run: thunderbird --version
    Affected if Version is below 128.8.0 or between 129.0 and 135.x (any version below 136.0 but at or above 129.0)
  3. Verify web content handling is enabled
    Confirm that Firefox or Thunderbird has JavaScript enabled and can render HTML email or web content. Default installations allow this.
    Affected if The application renders web content or HTML email, which is the default behavior

You are affected if Firefox is any version below 136.0, or Thunderbird is any version below 128.8.0 or between 129.0 and 135.x, and the application renders web/HTML content (default settings).

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 128.8.0 / 136.0 or later
Fixed in 128.8.0136.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade immediately to Firefox 137, Firefox ESR 128.9, Thunderbird 137, or Thunderbird 128.9. Organizations should deploy the updates via their standard patch management processes and verify completion across all affected endpoints.

Recommended fix High confidence

Firefox 137, Firefox ESR 128.9, Thunderbird 137, or Thunderbird 128.9 (depending on which product and channel is in use)

  1. Upgrade Firefox to version 137 or later
  2. Upgrade Firefox ESR to version 128.9 or later
  3. Upgrade Thunderbird to version 137 or later
  4. Upgrade Thunderbird to version 128.9 or later

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Firefox Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,060
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-3030 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-3030 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data