Incorrect Default PermissionsWeakness · CWE-276

CVE-2025-30518

MEDIUM · 6.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-11-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
67/100
Remediation priority · Elevated

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Incorrect default permissions for some Intel(R) PresentMon before version 2.3.1 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a high complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires active user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Intel PresentMon before version 2.3.1 has incorrect default permissions in its user-mode application (Ring 3), allowing an unprivileged but authenticated local user to potentially escalate privileges via file/permission manipulation that can be exploited with high complexity and active user interaction.

MitigationUpgrade Intel PresentMon to version 2.3.1 or later to obtain corrected default permissions; review file system permissions on the application directory as an interim measure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate Intel PresentMon installation
    Search for 'PresentMon' in Program Files directories or check common installation paths like C:\Program Files\Intel\PresentMon or C:\Program Files (x86)\Intel\PresentMon. Use Get-ChildItem -Recurse -Filter '*PresentMon*' or similar directory search commands.
    Affected if PresentMon is found installed on the system
  2. Identify installed version
    Locate the PresentMon.exe file and check its properties, or run 'PresentMon --version' or 'PresentMon -v' from the installation directory to retrieve the version number.
    Affected if The version displayed is before 2.3.1 (e.g., 2.3.0, 2.2.x, or any version number less than 2.3.1)
  3. Verify file permissions on application directory
    Right-click the PresentMon installation folder, go to Properties > Security, or use icacls command (e.g., icacls 'C:\Program Files\Intel\PresentMon') to inspect who has write/modify permissions.
    Affected if Non-administrative users or unprivileged accounts have Write, Modify, or Full Control permissions to the application directory or its executables
  4. Check for permission misconfiguration
    Review ACLs for the PresentMon.exe file specifically using 'icacls PresentMon.exe' and look for entries granting access to Users group or authenticated users with elevated permissions.
    Affected if Authenticated users or the Users group have permissions beyond Read/Execute on the executable or its parent folder

If Intel PresentMon is installed with a version lower than 2.3.1 AND non-admin users have write or modify access to the application directory or executable, the environment is vulnerable to this privilege escalation flaw.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Intel PresentMon to version 2.3.1 or later to obtain corrected default permissions; review file system permissions on the application directory as an interim measure.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

2.3.1

  1. Upgrade Intel(R) PresentMon to version 2.3.1 or later

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30518 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30518 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data