CVE-2025-30567
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in WP01 WP01 wp01 allows Path Traversal.This issue affects WP01: from n/a through <= 2.6.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencePath Traversal vulnerability in WP01 WordPress plugin allows attackers to access files outside the web root directory through manipulation of file path parameters, potentially exposing sensitive system files or configuration data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm WP01 plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins, or check /wp-content/plugins/ directory for wp01 folderAffected if WP01 plugin is present in the WordPress installation
-
Identify installed WP01 versionCheck the plugin header in wp-content/plugins/wp01/wp01.php for 'Version:' field, or view in WordPress plugin admin pageAffected if Version cannot be confirmed as the latest patched version (version comparison needed)
-
Verify web server access logs for path traversal attemptsReview Apache/nginx access logs for requests containing '../' patterns targeting WP01 plugin endpoints, e.g., grep -r "../" /var/log/apache2/ or /var/log/nginx/Affected if Logs show directory traversal patterns like '..' in file path parameters routed to WP01 plugin
-
Check for unauthorized file access indicatorsInspect web server error/access logs for repeated attempts to access paths outside web root (e.g., /etc/passwd, wp-config.php)Affected if Suspicious traversal patterns are found in logs targeting WP01 endpoints
You are affected if the WP01 plugin is installed and its version is older than the patched release, or if web server logs show path traversal attempts targeting WP01 plugin endpoints.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade WP01 to the latest version which includes proper path sanitization and input validation to prevent directory traversal attacks.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30567 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30567 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data