CVE-2025-30571
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in STEdb Corp. STEdb Forms stedb-forms allows SQL Injection.This issue affects STEdb Forms: from n/a through <= 1.0.4.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in STEdb Forms allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized user input. The vulnerability exists in versions up to and including 1.0.4, potentially allowing unauthorized database access, data exfiltration, or data manipulation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify STEdb Forms is installedLook for STEdb Forms application files in your web server document root, or check your software inventory/package manager for the STEdb Forms package.Affected if STEdb Forms is found installed on the system.
-
Determine installed versionCheck the version file, about page, or application header within the STEdb Forms installation directory. Common locations include a version.php, info.json, or the main index file containing version metadata.Affected if The installed version is 1.0.4 or lower.
-
Confirm database connectivity is activeCheck the application configuration file for database connection settings (e.g., db_config.php, config.xml) and verify the database connection is enabled and pointing to a live database.Affected if Database connectivity is configured and active.
-
Identify accessible input formsReview the application's form handlers and identify which forms accept user input and interact with the database. Check for forms that perform SQL queries based on user-submitted data.Affected if User-accessible forms that query the database are present and exposed.
-
Inspect input validation settingsExamine the application's configuration or code for any input validation, sanitization, or parameterization settings. Look for flags like 'input_filter', 'sanitize', or 'use_prepared_statements' in config files.Affected if No input sanitization or parameterized queries are configured for form inputs.
You are affected if STEdb Forms version 1.0.4 or lower is installed with database-enabled forms that lack input sanitization or parameterized queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched version of STEdb Forms when available, or implement parameterized queries/prepared statements for all database operations to neutralize SQL injection vectors.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30571 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30571 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data