Path TraversalWeakness · CWE-22

CVE-2025-30582

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-04-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
90/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in aytechnet DyaPress ERP/CRM dyapress allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects DyaPress ERP/CRM: from n/a through <= 18.0.2.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Path traversal vulnerability in DyaPress ERP/CRM allows attackers to use directory traversal sequences (../) in user-supplied input to access files outside restricted directories, combined with PHP local file inclusion enabling potential arbitrary code execution or sensitive file disclosure.

MitigationImplement strict input validation with allowlist-based path sanitization, restrict file inclusion to whitelisted directories, and upgrade to a patched version if available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify DyaPress ERP/CRM installation
    Search for DyaPress installation directories (common paths: /var/www/html/dyapress, /home/*/public_html/dyapress, C:\inetpub\wwwroot\dyapress) or look for dyapress-specific configuration files and databases
    Affected if DyaPress ERP/CRM is installed on the system
  2. Determine DyaPress version
    Check version file (typically version.php, about.php, or config files in the root directory) or access the admin dashboard About section
    Affected if Version cannot be determined or is older than any publicly available patch
  3. Identify file inclusion endpoints
    Search web directory for PHP files using include, require, include_once, or require_once with variable parameters (e.g., grep -r 'include($' /path/to/dyapress). Common vulnerable patterns: include($_GET['page']), require($_POST['file'])
    Affected if PHP files accept user-controlled input for file inclusion without sanitization
  4. Verify directory traversal is possible
    Test suspected endpoints with traversal sequences (e.g., ../../../../etc/passwd) in vulnerable parameters. Check if input validation blocks or allows ../ sequences
    Affected if Directory traversal sequences are not blocked and file contents outside the webroot can be retrieved
  5. Check PHP configuration for file inclusion risks
    Examine php.ini for allow_url_fopen=On and allow_url_include=On settings. These increase exploitation severity but are not required for the traversal itself
    Affected if allow_url_include is enabled, allowing remote file inclusion in addition to local file inclusion

The environment is affected if DyaPress ERP/CRM is installed with accessible file inclusion functionality that does not sanitize directory traversal sequences from user input.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict input validation with allowlist-based path sanitization, restrict file inclusion to whitelisted directories, and upgrade to a patched version if available.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30582 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30582 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data