Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2025-30592

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-03-24
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in WesternDeal Advanced Dewplayer advanced-dewplayer allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Advanced Dewplayer: from n/a through <= 1.6.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Missing authorization vulnerability in Advanced Dewplayer allows unauthenticated or unauthorized attackers to access functionality or data beyond their intended privileges due to incorrectly configured access control security levels, enabling potential data exposure or unauthorized actions.

MitigationImplement proper authorization checks on all endpoints and functions, ensuring role-based access control (RBAC) is correctly enforced and users can only access resources permitted for their security level.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Advanced Dewplayer installation
    Check WordPress plugins directory or wp-content/plugins folder for 'advanced-dewplayer' folder; alternatively, query WordPress database: SELECT option_value FROM wp_options WHERE option_name = 'active_plugins' and option_value LIKE '%dewplayer%'
    Affected if Plugin is installed and active in WordPress
  2. Identify installed version
    Check plugin main file (usually advanced-dewplayer.php) for version comment or header, or query: SELECT option_value FROM wp_options WHERE option_name = 'advanced_dewplayer_version'
    Affected if Version cannot be verified or is unknown (no patch version available for comparison)
  3. Test admin endpoint access without authentication
    Attempt to access common admin-ajax.php actions or plugin-specific endpoints (e.g., /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=dewplayer_*) without logged-in session using curl or browser
    Affected if Requests return successful data or 200 OK status without requiring authentication
  4. Verify authorization on sensitive functions
    Inspect plugin source code for capability checks (current_user_can, check_admin_referer, wp_verify_nonce) on all PHP functions handling data retrieval or player configuration
    Affected if No capability checks found before data access or modification operations
  5. Check for unprotected data exposure
    Review if player playlist files, audio files, or configuration data can be accessed via direct URL without authentication
    Affected if Sensitive data or playlist configurations are accessible without login

If Advanced Dewplayer is installed and sensitive admin functions or data are accessible without authentication or proper capability checks, the environment is affected by this authorization bypass.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper authorization checks on all endpoints and functions, ensuring role-based access control (RBAC) is correctly enforced and users can only access resources permitted for their security level.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30592 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30592 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data