CVE-2025-3063
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Shopper Approved Reviews plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data that can lead to privilege escalation due to a missing capability check on the ajax_callback_update_sa_option() function in versions 2.0 to 2.1. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to update arbitrary options on the WordPress site. This can be leveraged to update the default role for registration to administrator and enable user registration for attackers to gain administrative user access to a vulnerable site.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Shopper Approved Reviews WordPress plugin versions 2.0-2.1 lacks a capability check on the ajax_callback_update_sa_option() function, allowing any authenticated user with Subscriber-level access to update arbitrary WordPress site options via AJAX. This broken access control can be exploited to escalate privileges by changing the default registration role to Administrator and enabling user registration, giving attackers admin access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm plugin installation and versionNavigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and locate 'Shopper Approved Reviews'. Check the version number displayed under the plugin name. Alternatively, inspect the plugin header in /wp-content/plugins/shopper-approved-reviews/ folder for the Version tag.Affected if The plugin is installed and the version is 2.0 through 2.1 (inclusive).
-
Identify subscriber-level or higher user accountsGo to Users > All Users in WordPress admin. Review the list for any accounts with Subscriber, Contributor, Author, Editor, or Administrator roles that you did not create. Check user registration settings under Settings > General to see if registration is enabled.Affected if Any authenticated user with Subscriber-level access or higher exists AND user registration is enabled in WordPress settings.
-
Verify default user registration roleIn WordPress admin, go to Settings > General and locate 'Default Role' dropdown. Check if it is set to Administrator or any elevated role.Affected if The default new user registration role is set to Administrator.
-
Audit administrator accounts for unauthorized accessReview all user accounts with Administrator role. Check the user email addresses, account creation dates, and last login times. Compare against known legitimate administrators.Affected if There are administrator accounts that were not created by known site administrators, or administrator accounts with suspicious creation dates.
You are affected if the Shopper Approved Reviews plugin versions 2.0-2.1 are installed, any non-admin user account exists on the site, and user registration is enabled or unauthorized administrator accounts are present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate to the latest version of the plugin which should include proper capability checks, or remove the plugin if no patched version is available.
Version 2.1.1 or latest available version
- Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Find the 'Shopper Approved Reviews' plugin
- Check if an update is available and upgrade to the latest version (2.1.1 or higher)
- If no automatic update is available, manually download the latest version from wordpress.org and reinstall
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-3063 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-3063 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data