dbcve.org
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-30632

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-06-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
61/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in pozzad Global Translator global-translator allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Global Translator: from n/a through <= 2.0.2.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in pozzad Global Translator plugin versions 2.0.2 and below allows attackers to execute unauthorized state-changing actions by tricking authenticated users into submitting malicious requests.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) on all state-changing operations and validate Origin/Referer headers to prevent forged requests.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the pozzad Global Translator plugin files
    Check the WordPress plugins directory (wp-content/plugins/) for a folder named 'global-translator' or similar variant of pozzad Global Translator
    Affected if The plugin folder exists in the WordPress installation
  2. Identify the installed version number
    Open the main plugin PHP file and locate the version in the plugin header comment (e.g., 'Version: x.x.x') or check the readme.txt file for the 'Stable tag' entry
    Affected if The version is 2.0.2 or lower, or if no version is declared and the plugin is present
  3. Verify WordPress admin authentication state
    Check if any user accounts with administrator or editor privileges exist in the wp_users table and if the plugin exposes admin-facing functionality
    Affected if Authenticated users with elevated privileges use the plugin's translation features
  4. Confirm state-changing plugin features are accessible
    Inspect the plugin code for functions that modify settings, translations, or database records without requiring nonce/token validation on POST or GET requests
    Affected if The plugin performs settings changes, translation updates, or other modifications without anti-CSRF token verification

You are affected if the pozzad Global Translator plugin is installed at version 2.0.2 or below and contains state-changing operations accessible to authenticated users without CSRF protection.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) on all state-changing operations and validate Origin/Referer headers to prevent forged requests.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30632 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30632 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data