CVE-2025-30645
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability in the flow daemon (flowd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series allows an attacker causing specific, valid control traffic to be sent out of a Dual-Stack (DS) Lite tunnel to crash the flowd process, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). Continuous triggering of specific control traffic will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. On all SRX platforms, when specific, valid control traffic needs to be sent out of a DS-Lite tunnel, a segmentation fault occurs within the flowd process, resulting in a network outage until the flowd process restarts. This issue affects Junos OS on SRX Series: * All versions before 21.2R3-S9, * from 21.4 before 21.4R3-S9, * from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S5, * from 22.4 before 22.4R3-S6, * from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S3, * from 23.4 before 23.4R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in the flow daemon (flowd) of Juniper Junos OS on SRX Series devices causes a segmentation fault when specific valid control traffic is transmitted through a Dual-Stack Lite tunnel, crashing the flowd process and creating a denial of service condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.2= 21.2= 21.4= 22.2= 22.4= 23.2= 23.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelRun 'show chassis hardware' or 'show version' to confirm the device is an SRX Series applianceAffected if Device is not SRX Series (vulnerability only affects SRX hardware)
-
Check Junos OS versionRun 'show version' and compare the installed Junos version against the affected list: < 21.2, 21.2, 21.4, 22.2, 22.4, 23.2, or 23.4Affected if The installed version matches any of the affected versions listed
-
Verify Dual-Stack Lite configurationRun 'show configuration | match ds-lite' or 'show configuration tunnel' to check if DS-Lite tunnels are configuredAffected if Dual-Stack Lite tunnel interfaces are configured on the device
-
Inspect for flowd crash logsRun 'show log messages | match flowd' or check '/var/log/messages' for recent flowd crash entriesAffected if Recent flowd process crashes or segmentation faults are logged
Device is affected if it is an SRX Series running any of the listed affected Junos versions AND has Dual-Stack Lite tunnels configured, or if flowd crashes have already occurred.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.2
Apply the vendor-supplied Junos OS patches: upgrade to 21.2R3-S9, 21.4R3-S9, 22.2R3-S5, 22.4R3-S6, 23.2R2-S3, 23.4R2 or later versions. Until patched, monitor for flowd crashes and consider isolating affected devices from untrusted traffic.
21.2R3-S9 (or later), 21.4R3-S9 (or later), 22.2R3-S5 (or later), 22.4R3-S6 (or later), 23.2R2-S3 (or later), or 23.4R2
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version running on the SRX Series device using 'show version' command.
- 2. Determine which version branch (21.2, 21.4, 22.2, 22.4, 23.2, or 23.4) your current version belongs to.
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed version for your branch from the Juniper Networks support portal: 21.2R3-S9 or later, 21.4R3-S9 or later, 22.2R3-S5 or later, 22.4R3-S6 or later, 23.2R2-S3 or later, or 23.4R2 or later.
- 4. Upload the Junos OS upgrade package to the SRX device using 'file copy' or FTP/SCP to the /var/tmp directory.
- 5. Initiate the software installation using 'request system software add /var/tmp/<package-name>' command.
- 6. After installation completes, reboot the device using 'request system reboot' command to load the new Junos OS version.
- 7. Verify the upgrade was successful by running 'show version' and confirming the new version is installed.
- 8. Verify flowd process is running normally using 'show system processes extensive | match flowd'.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,368.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30645 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30645 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data