CVE-2025-30647
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime vulnerability in the packet forwarding engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series allows an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS). In a subscriber management scenario, login/logout activity triggers a memory leak, and the leaked memory gradually increments and eventually results in a crash. user@host> show chassis fpc Temp CPU Utilization (%) CPU Utilization (%) Memory Utilization (%) Slot State (C) Total Interrupt 1min 5min 15min DRAM (MB) Heap Buffer 2 Online 36 10 0 9 8 9 32768 26 0 This issue affects Junos OS on MX Series: * All versions before 21.2R3-S9 * from 21.4 before 21.4R3-S10 * from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S6 * from 22.4 before 22.4R3-S5 * from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S3 * from 23.4 before 23.4R2-S3 * from 24.2 before 24.2R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA memory leak vulnerability exists in the packet forwarding engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series routers. In subscriber management scenarios, login/logout activity triggers a memory leak that gradually increments with each cycle, eventually exhausting memory and causing the device to crash. An unauthenticated adjacent attacker can trigger this DoS condition by causing repeated subscriber login/logout events.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.2= 21.2= 21.4= 22.2= 22.4= 23.2= 23.4= 24.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelRun 'show chassis hardware' or 'show system information' to confirm the device is an MX Series routerAffected if Device is not an MX Series router - this vulnerability only affects MX Series
-
Check Junos OS versionRun 'show version' to obtain the installed Junos OS version numberAffected if Version matches or falls within: < 21.2, 21.2, 21.4, 22.2, 22.4, 23.2, 23.4, or 24.2
-
Verify subscriber management is enabledRun 'show subscribers summary' or check configuration for 'access' or 'subscriber-management' related configsAffected if Subscriber management is configured and active - the vulnerability only triggers through subscriber login/logout cycles
-
Monitor PFE memory usageRun 'show chassis pic 0 fpc-slot 0 pfe-statistics memory' or 'show pfe statistics memory' to check current memory consumptionAffected if Memory usage shows progressive increase or abnormally high utilization over time
-
Check for crash or memory exhaustion eventsRun 'show system core-dumps' and review system logs (show log messages) for PFE crashes or out-of-memory eventsAffected if Recent crashes or memory exhaustion events correlated with subscriber activity are present
You are affected if you run an affected Junos version on an MX Series router with subscriber management enabled and observe elevated PFE memory usage or crashes correlating with subscriber login/logout activity.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.2
Apply the appropriate Juniper OS patch from the affected version ranges (21.2R3-S9, 21.4R3-S10, 22.2R3-S6, 22.4R3-S5, 23.2R2-S3, 23.4R2-S3, or 24.2R2 and later). As an interim control, limit adjacent network access to prevent unauthorized subscriber management activity.
21.2R3-S9 / 21.4R3-S10 / 22.2R3-S6 / 22.4R3-S5 / 23.2R2-S3 / 23.4R2-S3 / 24.2R2 (depending on current branch)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version on MX Series device using 'show version'
- 2. Plan maintenance window as upgrade requires PFE restart
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed Junos OS version from Juniper support portal (21.2R3-S9, 21.4R3-S10, 22.2R3-S6, 22.4R3-S5, 23.2R2-S3, 23.4R2-S3, or 24.2R2)
- 4. Upload the Junos OS image to the device via SCP/FTP
- 5. Run 'request system software add <package> reboot' to install and reboot
- 6. After reboot, verify new version with 'show version'
- 7. Monitor memory utilization with 'show chassis fpc' to confirm leak is resolved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,256.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30647 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30647 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data