CVE-2025-30656
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Handling of Additional Special Element vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series with MS-MPC, MS-MIC and SPC3, and SRX Series, allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS). If the SIP ALG processes specifically formatted SIP invites, a memory corruption will occur which will lead to a crash of the FPC processing these packets. Although the system will automatically recover with the restart of the FPC, subsequent SIP invites will cause the crash again and lead to a sustained DoS. This issue affects Junos OS on MX Series and SRX Series: * all versions before 21.2R3-S9, * 21.4 versions before 21.4R3-S10, * 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S6, * 22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S5, * 23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S3, * 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S3, * 24.2 versions before 24.2R1-S2, 24.2R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA memory corruption vulnerability exists in the SIP Application Layer Gateway (ALG) on Juniper MX and SRX Series devices. When the SIP ALG processes specially formatted SIP INVITE packets, improper handling of special elements in the SIP message triggers memory corruption, causing the FPC to crash. While the system auto-recovers, subsequent SIP INVITEs will cause repeated crashes, creating a sustained DoS condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.2= 21.2= 21.4= 22.2= 22.4= 23.2= 23.4= 24.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify the Junos OS version installedRun 'show version' on the device CLI and note the version number (for example: 21.2R3, 22.4R1, etc.)Affected if The installed version matches any of the following: < 21.2, 21.2, 21.4, 22.2, 22.4, 23.2, 23.4, or 24.2 (or the R1/R2/R3 sub-versions within these releases that are not in the fixed releases)
-
Confirm SIP ALG is enabledRun 'show system services alg' or inspect the configuration under 'set system services alg' to see if the SIP ALG module is activeAffected if SIP ALG is enabled and running on the device (the vulnerability only affects systems where the SIP ALG is turned on)
-
Check for recent FPC crashesRun 'show chassis fpc' and 'show log messages' (or 'show system crash') to look for recent FPC restart events or SIP-related error messagesAffected if Recent FPC crashes have occurred and are correlated with SIP INVITE traffic processing
A device is affected if it runs a vulnerable Junos version listed above AND has the SIP ALG feature enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.2
Upgrade Junos OS to a fixed version (21.2R3-S9, 21.4R3-S10, 22.2R3-S6, 22.4R3-S5, 23.2R2-S3, 23.4R2-S3, 24.2R1-S2, or 24.2R2) per the Juniper advisory. Alternatively, disable the SIP ALG if not required.
Upgrade to the minimum fixed version for your branch: 21.2R3-S9, 21.4R3-S10, 22.2R3-S6, 22.4R3-S5, 23.2R2-S3, 23.4R2-S3, or 24.2R2 (or later)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version on the affected MX Series (with MS-MPC, MS-MIC, SPC3) or SRX Series devices using 'show version'
- 2. Determine which branch (21.2, 21.4, 22.2, 22.4, 23.2, 23.4, or 24.2) the current version belongs to
- 3. For each branch, upgrade to the minimum fixed version: 21.2R3-S9, 21.4R3-S10, 22.2R3-S6, 22.4R3-S5, 23.2R2-S3, 23.4R2-S3, or 24.2R2 (or 24.2R1-S2) respectively
- 4. Alternatively, upgrade to the most recent available release for your hardware platform from https://supportportal.juniper.net
- 5. After upgrade, verify the SIP ALG is functioning properly with 'show security alg sip'
- 6. Test with legitimate SIP traffic to confirm no crashes occur
- 7. Monitor FPC stability with 'show chassis fpc' after processing SIP invites
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30656 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30656 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data