CVE-2025-30659
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS). When a device configured for Secure Vector Routing (SVR) receives a specifically malformed packet the PFE will crash and restart. This issue affects Junos OS on SRX Series: * All 21.4 versions, * 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S6, * 22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S6, * 23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S3, * 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S4, * 24.2 versions before 24.2R2. This issue does not affect versions before 21.4.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA length parameter inconsistency in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Junos OS on SRX Series allows an unauthenticated attacker to send a specifically malformed packet to a device configured for Secure Vector Routing (SVR), triggering a PFE crash and restart causing denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 21.4= 22.2= 22.4= 23.2= 23.4= 24.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device is SRX SeriesRun 'show chassis hardware' or 'show system information' to identify the device model. Ensure it is an SRX Series firewall.Affected if Device is not an SRX Series model - the vulnerability only affects SRX devices
-
Check Junos OS versionRun 'show version' or 'show system information' to obtain the installed Junos OS version.Affected if Version matches one of the affected releases: 21.4, 22.2, 22.4, 23.2, 23.4, or 24.2
-
Verify Secure Vector Routing is enabledRun 'show configuration routing-options' and look for 'secure-vector-routing' under the routing-options hierarchy, or check 'show configuration' for any SVR-related configuration.Affected if SVR is configured and enabled - this is required for the malformed packet to trigger the PFE crash
Device is affected if it is an SRX Series running a listed affected Junos version AND has Secure Vector Routing (SVR) enabled in the configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied patches by upgrading to the fixed versions (22.2R3-S6, 22.4R3-S6, 23.2R2-S3, 23.4R2-S4, or 24.2R2) or disable SVR if not required while planning the upgrade.
24.2R2 (or later stable release)
- Identify the current Junos OS version running on the SRX Series device using 'show version'
- Confirm the device is configured for Secure Vector Routing (SVR) if possible using 'show configuration | match svr'
- Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade to minimize disruption
- Download the appropriate fixed Junos OS image (22.2R3-S6, 22.4R3-S6, 23.2R2-S3, 23.4R2-S4, or 24.2R2 or later) from Juniper Networks
- Upload the new Junos OS image to the device using 'request system software add' or similar method
- Reboot the device to apply the new software using 'request system reboot'
- After reboot, verify the PFE is operational using 'show chassis fabric fpc' and confirm normal device operation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30659 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30659 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data