CVE-2025-30783
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in jgwhite33 WP Google Review Slider wp-google-places-review-slider allows SQL Injection.This issue affects WP Google Review Slider: from n/a through <= 16.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WP Google Review Slider plugin (wp-google-places-review-slider) enables SQL Injection through forged requests. The vulnerability exists in versions up to and including 16.0, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary SQL queries via crafted requests when combined with CSRF exploitation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the WP Google Review Slider plugin filesCheck if the plugin directory wp-content/plugins/wp-google-places-review-slider/ exists on the WordPress serverAffected if The plugin directory exists and the plugin is installed
-
Determine the installed plugin versionOpen the main plugin file (wp-google-places-review-slider.php) and locate the Version header in the plugin comment block, or check readme.txt for the version fieldAffected if The version number is 16.0 or lower
-
Verify the plugin is activeLog into WordPress admin and check Plugins > Installed Plugins to confirm WP Google Review Slider is activatedAffected if The plugin is active and accessible to authenticated users
-
Inspect form actions for CSRF protectionExamine the plugin's admin forms (in the /admin/ folder if present) and look for nonce fields or token parameters on state-changing actions such as saving settings, importing reviews, or deleting recordsAffected if No nonce token or anti-CSRF mechanism is found on sensitive forms
You are affected if the WP Google Review Slider plugin is installed with version 16.0 or lower and lacks anti-CSRF protections on its forms, allowing SQL injection via forged requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate WP Google Review Slider to a version beyond 16.0. Implement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing actions and use prepared statements/parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30783 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30783 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data