CVE-2025-30824
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in Israpil Textmetrics webtexttool allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Textmetrics: from n/a through <= 3.6.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · low confidenceMissing authorization vulnerability in Textmetrics webtexttool allows attackers to access functionality or data without proper authentication. The issue involves incorrectly configured access control security levels, likely enabling unauthenticated or insufficiently authorized access to protected resources.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Textmetrics webtexttool installationLocate the webtexttool application in your environment by searching for its executable, service, or web application filesAffected if The software is present and running in your environment
-
Identify access control configuration filesSearch for configuration files related to authentication and authorization settings, typically found in config directories or application settingsAffected if Access control settings are set to a weak or permissive level, or if authorization checks are disabled entirely
-
Test protected endpoints for authorization enforcementAttempt to access sensitive functionality or data endpoints without providing credentials or with an unprivileged accountAffected if Access is granted to protected resources without proper authentication or authorization validation
-
Review security level settingsExamine the application security configuration to verify if security levels are properly set according to the principle of least privilegeAffected if Security levels are configured too permissively or incorrectly, allowing unintended access to functionality or data
-
Audit endpoint access patternsReview application logs or access records to identify if unauthenticated or unauthorized requests have been able to access protected endpointsAffected if Logs show successful access to sensitive areas without proper authorization tokens or permissions
A user is affected if Textmetrics webtexttool is installed and lacks proper authorization enforcement on sensitive endpoints or has incorrectly configured access control security levels.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks on all sensitive endpoints and functions, ensuring users can only access resources they are explicitly permitted to access. Verify access control configuration aligns with the principle of least privilege.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30824 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30824 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data