CVE-2025-30933
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type vulnerability in LiquidThemes LogisticsHub logistics-hub allows Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server.This issue affects LogisticsHub: from n/a through <= 1.1.6.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUnrestricted file upload vulnerability in LogisticsHub allows attackers to upload malicious web shell files to the server. Since uploaded files are stored in a web-accessible location without proper validation, attackers can execute the web shell to achieve remote code execution on the server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify LogisticsHub installation and versionSearch for LogisticsHub application files, check installed packages, or query the application for its version number (e.g., via /about page, metadata files, or package manager)Affected if LogisticsHub is installed and version is within affected range or unknown
-
Locate file upload functionalityIdentify the upload endpoint or feature in LogisticsHub (check web routes, forms, or API endpoints that handle file uploads)Affected if File upload feature exists and is accessible to users
-
Verify upload storage locationInspect application configuration or code to determine where uploaded files are stored; check if the storage directory is within the webroot (e.g., /uploads, /images, /attachments in web-accessible path)Affected if Uploaded files are stored in a directory accessible via HTTP/HTTPS
-
Check file validation controlsReview application code or configuration for file type/extension validation on uploads; look for allowlists, magic byte checks, or content-type validationAffected if No strict file validation (allowlist of safe extensions) is implemented, or validation can be bypassed
-
Scan for suspicious files in upload directoriesList all files in the upload storage directory; look for atypical extensions (e.g., .php, .asp, .jsp, .exe, .phtml) or files with web shell patternsAffected if Unexpected executable or script files are present in the upload directory
If LogisticsHub is running with file upload functionality that stores files in a web-accessible location without strict validation, the environment is likely affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict file upload validation: validate file type/extension using allowlist, sanitize filenames, store uploads outside webroot or with non-executable extensions, and scan for existing compromise.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30933 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30933 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data