CVE-2025-30944
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in Essekia Tablesome Table Premium tablesome-premium allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Tablesome Table Premium: from n/a through <= 1.1.23.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Tablesome Table Premium WordPress plugin versions up to 1.1.23 contains a missing authorization vulnerability allowing users to access functionality not properly constrained by access control lists (ACLs). An unauthenticated attacker can potentially execute privileged actions due to missing capability checks on certain functions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the Tablesome plugin directoryCheck the WordPress plugins folder at /wp-content/plugins/ for a folder named 'tablesome' or similar. List all installed plugins via wp-cli: wp plugin list --status=activeAffected if The plugin folder exists and the plugin is active
-
Identify the installed versionRead the main plugin file header. In the tablesome plugin folder, open the primary PHP file (often tablesome.php or similar) and look for the 'Version' header comment, or query it via wp-cli: wp plugin get tablesome --field=versionAffected if The version number is 1.1.23 or lower
-
Verify the plugin is accessible to unauthenticated usersConfirm the WordPress site allows public access. The vulnerability is exploitable by unauthenticated (not-logged-in) users, so if the site has open registration or allows guest access, the attack surface exists. No specific configuration toggle needs to be enabled for the flaw.Affected if The plugin is active and the site permits unauthenticated access to WordPress functionality
A user is affected if Tablesome Table Premium plugin is installed, active, and running version 1.1.23 or lower on a WordPress site that permits unauthenticated access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Tablesome Table Premium to a version beyond 1.1.23 that includes proper authorization checks. Until then, restrict access to the wp-admin directory or disable the plugin if possible.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30944 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30944 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data