CVE-2025-30989
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Renzo Tejada Libro de Reclamaciones y Quejas libro-de-reclamaciones-y-quejas allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Libro de Reclamaciones y Quejas: from n/a through <= 0.9.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL Injection vulnerability in the 'Libro de Reclamaciones y Quejas' complaints application allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized user inputs. The vulnerability exists in versions up to and including 0.9, potentially allowing unauthorized database access, data exfiltration, or manipulation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if the complaints application is presentLocate the 'Libro de Reclamaciones y Quejas' application in your environment. This may be a standalone module, plugin, or integrated feature within a larger system. Search for files, packages, or services matching this name.Affected if The application exists in your environment
-
Determine the installed versionCheck the version number of the 'Libro de Reclamaciones y Quejas' application. Look in configuration files, package manifests, about pages, or use version-checking commands specific to your deployment method.Affected if The version is 0.9 or lower
-
Inspect database query code for dynamic SQLExamine the source code handling complaint submissions. Look for database query functions that construct SQL statements using string concatenation or string formatting with user-supplied input fields such as names, descriptions, or complaint details.Affected if Dynamic SQL queries concatenate user input directly without parameterization
-
Verify input sanitization in complaint formsReview the input validation and sanitization logic for the complaint submission forms. Check if user inputs are passed directly to SQL queries without using prepared statements, parameterized queries, or input validation.Affected if User inputs from complaint forms are used in SQL queries without sanitization or parameterization
-
Check database user privilegesReview the database credentials used by the application. Determine if the database user has excessive privileges beyond what the legitimate application functions require.Affected if The application database user has privileges that could allow exploitation to access or modify data beyond the complaints module
Your environment is affected if the 'Libro de Reclamaciones y Quejas' application is present at version 0.9 or lower and user inputs from complaint forms are used in dynamically constructed SQL queries without sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements to properly sanitize user inputs. Validate and whitelist all input data before using it in database queries.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30989 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30989 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data