CVE-2025-31013
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Themify Folo allows Reflected XSS. This issue affects Themify Folo: from n/a through 1.9.6.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceReflected XSS vulnerability in Themify Folo plugin allows attackers to inject malicious scripts via unsanitized user input that gets reflected in web pages without proper encoding.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Themify Folo plugin is installedCheck your WordPress site's plugin directory orwp-content/plugins/ folder for the Themify Folo pluginAffected if The plugin Themify Folo is present in the WordPress installation
-
Identify the installed version of Themify FoloCheck the plugin's main PHP file header for the Version field, or view the plugin in the WordPress admin plugins listAffected if The installed version is older than the patched version (any version prior to the fix for CVE-2025-31013)
-
Inspect plugin source for reflected input handlingReview the main plugin PHP files (typically folio.php or similar) for parameters that are directly echoed or reflected in HTML output without sanitization functions such as esc_html(), esc_attr(), or wp_kses()Affected if User-supplied parameters are reflected in page output without proper output encoding
-
Test for reflected XSS via URL parametersIdentify any GET/POST parameters used by the plugin and attempt to inject benign HTML/script tags (such as <script>alert(1)</script> or <img src=x onerror=alert(1)>) into those parameters, then inspect the resulting page source to see if the input is rendered as-isAffected if Injected script tags or HTML execute or appear unescaped in the browser response
The environment is affected if Themify Folo plugin is installed and any user input is reflected in web pages without HTML encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Themify Folo to latest version and implement proper input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied data.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-31013 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-31013 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data