Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-31026

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-04-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Austin Comment Validation Reloaded comment-validation-reloaded allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Comment Validation Reloaded: from n/a through <= 0.5.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Comment Validation Reloaded plugin enables attackers to inject malicious scripts via stored XSS. By tricking authenticated administrators into performing unintended actions (such as submitting forms), attackers can persistently embed JavaScript that executes for all site visitors viewing the compromised comments.

MitigationUpdate the plugin to a patched version immediately. If no update is available, disable the plugin entirely and implement manual CSRF token validation and input sanitization on any comment-handling code before re-enabling.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Comment Validation Reloaded plugin is installed
    Access your WordPress admin panel, navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins, and search for 'Comment Validation Reloaded' in the list of installed plugins
    Affected if The plugin appears in the installed plugins list
  2. Determine the installed version
    In the Plugins list, click on 'View Details' next to Comment Validation Reloaded, or inspect the plugin header in the main plugin file (usually in wp-content/plugins/comment-validation-reloaded/)
    Affected if The displayed version matches any version of this plugin (the vulnerability affects this plugin regardless of specific version)
  3. Confirm the plugin is active
    In Plugins > Installed Plugins, verify that Comment Validation Reloaded shows as 'Active' under the plugin status column
    Affected if The plugin status shows Active or Network Active
  4. Inspect comment-handling functionality
    Navigate to the plugin settings (usually under Settings > Comment Validation or similar) to confirm the plugin is configured to validate/process comments
    Affected if The plugin settings show comment validation is enabled or the plugin is processing comments
  5. Check for suspicious comments in the database
    Query the wp_comments table in your database (or use a plugin like WP-Optimize) to look for comments containing script tags, iframe tags, or javascript: URLs, especially in comment fields like comment_content, author, or URL
    Affected if Any comments contain executable JavaScript or HTML script tags that were not intentionally added by legitimate administrators

A user is affected if the Comment Validation Reloaded plugin is installed and active on their WordPress site, as the CSRF vulnerability exists in this plugin and could allow stored XSS injection.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update the plugin to a patched version immediately. If no update is available, disable the plugin entirely and implement manual CSRF token validation and input sanitization on any comment-handling code before re-enabling.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-31026 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-31026 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data