PHP File Inclusion (RFI/LFI)Weakness · CWE-98

CVE-2025-31030

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-04-17
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
82/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in Jiro Sasamoto Ray Enterprise Translation lingotek-translation allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects Ray Enterprise Translation: from n/a through <= 1.7.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability in the Ray Enterprise Translation component (lingotek-translation) where improper control of filenames in PHP include/require statements allows attackers to include arbitrary local PHP files. The vulnerability stems from user-supplied input being used directly in file inclusion operations without proper validation.

MitigationImplement strict input validation using an allowlist approach for file inclusion parameters, sanitize or reject path traversal sequences (..), and ensure include/require statements never accept unsanitized user input directly.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if lingotek-translation component is installed
    Search the codebase or module directory for files related to 'lingotek-translation' or 'Ray Enterprise Translation'. Check composer.json, module lists, or application dependency manifests for this component.
    Affected if The lingotek-translation component is found in the environment
  2. Locate PHP files handling file inclusion in the translation module
    Search the lingotek-translation directory for PHP files containing include, require, include_once, or require_once statements. Review the codebase structure to identify translation-related PHP files.
    Affected if PHP files with inclusion functions exist in the translation component
  3. Inspect file inclusion logic for unsanitized user input
    Open the identified PHP inclusion files and trace how parameters are handled. Look for $_GET, $_POST, or other user-supplied data being passed directly to include/require statements without validation.
    Affected if User-controlled parameters are used directly in include/require without validation
  4. Check for path traversal sequences in file inclusion parameters
    Test or review the file inclusion parameters for the presence of '../' sequences or absolute path inputs. Examine the code for lack of path traversal sanitization (e.g., no basename(), no allowlist validation).
    Affected if The code allows path traversal sequences or absolute paths in inclusion parameters without sanitization
  5. Verify the affected feature is accessible
    Determine if the vulnerable file inclusion code can be reached through web requests, CLI, or API endpoints. Check if authentication or other access controls exist on the affected functionality.
    Affected if The vulnerable file inclusion code is accessible without proper access restrictions

The environment is affected if the lingotek-translation component is installed and contains PHP file inclusion code that uses unsanitized user input directly in include/require statements, allowing path traversal.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict input validation using an allowlist approach for file inclusion parameters, sanitize or reject path traversal sequences (..), and ensure include/require statements never accept unsanitized user input directly.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $3,000
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-31030 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-31030 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data