CVE-2025-3113
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA valid, authenticated user with sufficient privileges and who is aware of Continuous Compliance’s internal database configurations can leverage the application’s built-in Connector functionality to access Continuous Compliance’s internal database. This allows the user to explore the internal database schema and export its data, including the properties of Connecters and Rule Sets.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an authenticated privilege escalation vulnerability in Continuous Compliance where the built-in Connector functionality can be exploited to access the application's internal database. An authenticated user with sufficient privileges can bypass intended access boundaries to explore the database schema and export sensitive data including Connector and Rule Set properties.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Continuous Compliance product and versionLocate the installed Continuous Compliance application and retrieve its version number through the product's UI, about page, or command-line interfaceAffected if The installed version falls within any affected version range (compare to vendor-provided version information)
-
Verify Connector functionality statusCheck whether the built-in Connector feature is enabled in the application's configuration or administration settingsAffected if Connector functionality is enabled and accessible to authenticated users
-
Review user privilege assignmentsExamine user accounts and their assigned privilege levels within the Continuous Compliance system, focusing on users with elevated or administrative accessAffected if Any authenticated user possesses privileges that include access to Connector functionality and database interaction capabilities
-
Inspect database access configurationReview the application's configuration files, access controls, or permission settings related to internal database connectivity through ConnectorAffected if Database access via Connector is not explicitly restricted or lacks proper authorization enforcement
-
Audit Connector usage logsSearch application logs for any instances of database schema exploration or sensitive data exports performed through Connector functionalityAffected if Logs show unauthorized database schema access or sensitive data exports that occurred via Connector
A user is affected if they run a vulnerable version of Continuous Compliance with Connector functionality enabled, where authenticated users with elevated privileges can bypass authorization to access the internal database.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict and validate access to the internal database through the Connector functionality by implementing proper authorization checks and limiting database access to only necessary operations.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-3113 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-3113 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data