OS Command InjectionWeakness · CWE-78

CVE-2025-3128

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-08-21
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A remote unauthenticated attacker who has bypassed authentication could execute arbitrary OS commands to disclose, tamper with, destroy or delete information in Mitsubishi Electric smartRTU, or cause a denial-of service condition on the product.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A critical command injection vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric smartRTU allows a remote unauthenticated attacker who has bypassed authentication to execute arbitrary OS commands, potentially leading to full compromise of the device including data exfiltration, tampering, or destruction.

MitigationApply the vendor-provided security patch or update to the smartRTU firmware immediately. If no patch is available, restrict network access to the device and implement additional monitoring/controls until a fix is released.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify smartRTU installation
    Access the device web interface or check network inventory/scan results for 'smartRTU' or Mitsubishi Electric RTU devices. Consult device documentation or login to the RTU management console to confirm the product name.
    Affected if The device is confirmed to be a Mitsubishi Electric smartRTU model
  2. Determine firmware version
    Login to the smartRTU web interface or use SNMP/management access to retrieve the firmware version. This is typically found under System Info, About, or Firmware Update sections in the device management UI.
    Affected if The installed firmware version is older than the patched version released by Mitsubishi Electric for this vulnerability (version comparison needed against vendor advisory)
  3. Verify network exposure
    Check firewall rules, ACLs, or network segmentation to determine if the smartRTU management interface is accessible from untrusted networks or the internet. Use port scanning or network documentation to identify exposed management ports (HTTP/HTTPS typically).
    Affected if The smartRTU management interface is reachable from unauthenticated/untrusted network segments or directly from the internet
  4. Confirm authentication mechanism status
    Test whether the device authentication can be bypassed. Attempt to access protected endpoints or APIs without valid credentials. Review authentication logs for failed or anomalous login attempts.
    Affected if Authentication can be bypassed or anomalous authentication behavior is observed, indicating the prerequisite for command injection may be met
  5. Check for indicators of compromise
    Review device logs, network traffic logs, and system logs for suspicious command execution, unexpected processes, or unauthorized access attempts. Look for shell command patterns in logs or unusual outbound connections.
    Affected if Evidence of arbitrary command execution, suspicious processes, or unauthorized access attempts are found in logs or network traffic

A user is affected if they have a Mitsubishi Electric smartRTU with a vulnerable firmware version that is network-accessible to unauthenticated attackers and the authentication bypass condition exists or has been exploited.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor-provided security patch or update to the smartRTU firmware immediately. If no patch is available, restrict network access to the device and implement additional monitoring/controls until a fix is released.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,160.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-3128 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-3128 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data